Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 15;25(1):14.
doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0362-4.

Developing quality indicators for physician-staffed emergency medical services: a consensus process

Collaborators, Affiliations

Developing quality indicators for physician-staffed emergency medical services: a consensus process

Helge Haugland et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: There is increasing interest for quality measurement in health care services; pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) included. However, attempts of measuring the quality of physician-staffed EMS (P-EMS) are scarce. The aim of this study was to develop a set of quality indicators for international P-EMS to allow quality improvement initiatives.

Methods: A four-step modified nominal group technique process (expert panel method) was used.

Results: The expert panel reached consensus on 26 quality indicators for P-EMS. Fifteen quality indicators measure quality of P-EMS responses (response-specific quality indicators), whereas eleven quality indicators measure quality of P-EMS system structures (system-specific quality indicators).

Discussion: When measuring quality, the six quality dimensions defined by The Institute of Medicine should be appraised. We argue that this multidimensional approach to quality measurement seems particularly reasonable for services with a highly heterogenic patient population and complex operational contexts, like P-EMS. The quality indicators in this study were developed to represent a broad and comprehensive approach to quality measurement of P-EMS.

Conclusions: The expert panel successfully developed a set of quality indicators for international P-EMS. The quality indicators should be prospectively tested for feasibility, validity and reliability in clinical datasets. The quality indicators should then allow for adjusted quality measurement across different P-EMS systems.

Keywords: Modified nominal group technique; Physician-staffed emergency medical services; Quality indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual framework for multidimensional quality measurement in P-EMS

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fischer M, Kamp J, Garcia-Castrillo Riesgo L, Robertson-Steel I, Overton J, Ziemann A, et al. Comparing emergency medical service systems--a project of the European Emergency Data (EED) Project. Resuscitation. 2011;82(3):285–293. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kruger AJ, Lossius HM, Mikkelsen S, Kurola J, Castren M, Skogvoll E. Pre-hospital critical care by anaesthesiologist-staffed pre-hospital services in Scandinavia: a prospective population-based study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(9):1175–1185. doi: 10.1111/aas.12181. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghosh R, Pepe P. The critical care cascade: a systems approach. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15(4):279–283. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832faef2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lockey D. International EMS, systems: Geographical lottery and diversity but many common challenges. Resuscitation. 2009;80(7):722. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.04.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kruger AJ, Skogvoll E, Castren M, Kurola J, Lossius HM. ScanDoc Phase 1a Study G. Scandinavian pre-hospital physician-manned Emergency Medical Services--same concept across borders? Resuscitation. 2010;81(4):427–433. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.019. - DOI - PubMed