Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb 8;45(1):15-26.
doi: 10.1042/BST20160019.

Durable vesicles for reconstitution of membrane proteins in biotechnology

Affiliations
Review

Durable vesicles for reconstitution of membrane proteins in biotechnology

Paul A Beales et al. Biochem Soc Trans. .

Abstract

The application of membrane proteins in biotechnology requires robust, durable reconstitution systems that enhance their stability and support their functionality in a range of working environments. Vesicular architectures are highly desirable to provide the compartmentalisation to utilise the functional transmembrane transport and signalling properties of membrane proteins. Proteoliposomes provide a native-like membrane environment to support membrane protein function, but can lack the required chemical and physical stability. Amphiphilic block copolymers can also self-assemble into polymersomes: tough vesicles with improved stability compared with liposomes. This review discusses the reconstitution of membrane proteins into polymersomes and the more recent development of hybrid vesicles, which blend the robust nature of block copolymers with the biofunctionality of lipids. These novel synthetic vesicles hold great promise for enabling membrane proteins within biotechnologies by supporting their enhanced in vitro performance and could also contribute to fundamental biochemical and biophysical research by improving the stability of membrane proteins that are challenging to work with.

Keywords: bionanotechnology; block copolymers; in vitro reconstitution; membrane proteins; synthetic biology; vesicles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Polymersomes.
Polymer membranes are formed from amphiphilic block copolymers that often have AB, ABA or ABC polymer architectures. These membranes are interdigitated with a viscous polymer melt at its core and a hydrophilic corona of polymers in an extended brush-like conformation. Triblock copolymers may be a mixture of transmembrane and hairpins, which have both their hydrophilic blocks displayed at the same membrane surface. AB and ABA architectures and resulting polymerosome structures are shown on the left-hand side. Asymmetric ABC polymers (right-hand side) can give rise to asymmetric membrane chemistries if the hydrophilic block lengths are different: longer polymers prefer the positive curvature at the exterior of the vesicle and vice versa. Membrane proteins can be inserted into these polymer membranes even if the polymer membrane is much thicker than the hydrophobic thickness of the IMP, suggesting conformational adaption of the polymers to the protein, shown for OmpF (PDB ID: 2OMF) on the left-hand side [30]. Asymmetric ABC membranes may also help drive preferential orientation of the IMPs within the membrane, shown for Aqp0 (PDB ID: 2B6P) on the right-hand side [31].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Hybrid vesicles.
Hybrid vesicles combine lipids and block copolymers into blended membranes. These hybrid membranes can either be well mixed, giving homogeneous properties across the surface of the vesicle (left-hand side), or phase separated into lipid-rich and polymer-rich domains, which give rise to textured vesicle morphologies with coexisting domains of different structures and properties (right-hand side). Membrane proteins can be inserted into these hybrid membranes, either into homogeneous membranes (left-hand side, showing cyt bo3; PDB ID: 1FFT) or phase-separated membranes, where the preferred location of the IMP in the membrane is dependent on the relative properties of these two coexisting phases (right-hand side, showing MloK1; PDB ID: 4CHW).

References

    1. Früh V., Ijzerman A.P. and Siegal G. (2011) How to catch a membrane protein in action: a review of functional membrane protein immobilization strategies and their applications. Chem. Rev. 111, 640–656 doi: 10.1021/cr900088s - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shen H.-H., Lithgow T. and Martin L. (2013) Reconstitution of membrane proteins into model membranes: seeking better ways to retain protein activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 1589–1607 doi: 10.3390/ijms14011589 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arinaminpathy Y., Khurana E., Engelman D.M. and Gerstein M.B. (2009) Computational analysis of membrane proteins: the largest class of drug targets. Drug Discov. Today 14, 1130–1135 doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.08.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bayley H. and Jayasinghe L. (2004) Functional engineered channels and pores (Review). Mol. Membr. Biol. 21, 209–220 doi: 10.1080/09687680410001716853 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim Y.-R., Jung S., Ryu H., Yoo Y.-E., Kim S.M. and Jeon T.-J. (2012) Synthetic biomimetic membranes and their sensor applications. Sensors 12, 9530–9550 doi: 10.3390/s120709530 - DOI - PMC - PubMed