Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec/Jan;24(4):123-126.

HIV Prevention: Opportunities and Challenges

Affiliations
Review

HIV Prevention: Opportunities and Challenges

Jeanne M Marrazzo. Top Antivir Med. 2017 Dec/Jan.

Abstract

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based regimens has been shown to be effective in preventing acquisition of HIV infection, with protective efficacy being dependent on adherence to treatment. Data from the PROUD (Preexposure Option for Reducing HIV in the UK) and IPERGAY (Action to Prevent Risk Exposure By and For Gay Men) studies, the later of which employed event-driven PrEP, showed a high rate of protective efficacy of PrEP with TDF and emtricitabine among men who have sex with men. Data from the ASPIRE (A Study to Prevent Infection With a Ring for Extended Use) study of a dapivirine vaginal ring showed a moderate rate of protective efficacy among women older than 21 years. Ongoing investigations are examining long-acting PrEP modalities and combination PrEP and contraception products. This article summarizes a presentation by Jeanne M. Marrazzo, MD, MPH, at the IAS-USA continuing education program, Improving the Management of HIV Disease, held in Washington, DC, in April 2016.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
Protective efficacy of the dapivirine vaginal ring in the ASPIRE (A Study to Prevent Infection With a Ring for Extended Use) trial, by age group: (top) among participants aged 18 to 21 years efficacy of HIV protection was −27% (95% CI, −133 to 31); (middle) among participants aged 22 to 26 years efficacy of HIV protection was 56% (95% CI, 19 to 76); (bottom) among participants aged 27 to 45 years efficacy of HIV protection was 51% (95% CI, 8 to 74). Adapted from Baeten et al.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marrazzo JM, del Rio C, Holtgrave DR, et al. HIV prevention in clinical care settings: 2014 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society–USA Panel. JAMA. 2014; 312(4): 390–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Günthard HF, Saag MS, Benson CA, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2016 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society–USA panel. JAMA. 2016; 316(2): 191–210. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(5): 399–410. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(27): 2587–2599. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(5): 423–434. - PubMed

MeSH terms