[Establishment and application effect appraisement of community chronic obstructive pulmonary disease integrated management system]
- PMID: 28209040
- DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2017.02.005
[Establishment and application effect appraisement of community chronic obstructive pulmonary disease integrated management system]
Abstract
Objective: To establish the COPD community integrated management system suitable for our national situation and assess its effects in the prevention and treatment for COPD. Methods: The COPD community integrated management system based on the electronic management system was established, including the functional modules of preliminary screening for COPD, electronic health record, grading management and dual referral system, ect. Two townships were randomly selected from the rural areas in north Guangdong as Observational Community and Control Community, respectively. Resident families were randomly selected from the two communities. One resident aged 40 or higher who was selected randomly from each family was enrolled in the trial and followed up for 2 years.Of a total of 460 participants from the Observational Community, 340 participants accomplished the two-years the follow-up, among whom there were 45 COPD patients, 117 high risk population, 178 common population. Of a total of 380 participants from the Control Community, 212 participants accomplished the follow-up, among whom there were 39 COPD patients, 68 high risk population, 105 common population.According to the COPD community integrated management system, the health cares including preliminary screening for COPD, grading management and dual referral, ect. were implemented in the Observational Community. Essential diagnosis and treatment services were performed in the Control Community. The effects of the system were appraised by comparisons of the pulmonary function change, acute exacerbation, quality of life and change of risk factors, ect. between the two communities. Results: After the intervention, the follow-up rate, smoking-quitting rate, the proportions of decline in current smoking, passive smoking and switching to clean energy for cooking in the Observational Community were significantly greater than those in the Control Community(73.9% vs. 55.8%, 70.8% vs. 9.1%, 24.2% vs. 7.1%, 32.6% vs. 3.5%, 67.8% vs. 3.2%, respectively, P<0.05). COPD knowledge rates of residents in the Observational Community, including "knowing about COPD" , "knowing about the symptoms of COPD" , "Whether COPD can be prevented and treated" and "lung function test" were significantly greater than before (84.7% vs.30.0%, 76.4% vs.7.6%, 71.5% vs.6.8%, 72.1% vs.27.4%, respectively, P<0.05) and greater than those in the Control Community(84.7% vs.73.6%, 76.4% vs.9.4%, 71.5% vs.7.1%, 72.1% vs.32.5%, P<0.05). In the Observational Community, FEV(1) and FEV(1) %Pred were significantly greater than before (1.88±0.71 vs. 1.74±0.64, 75.6±25.0 vs. 69.4±20.5, respectively, P<0.05). The values of the difference before and after the experiment in the patients of GOLD 1 grade COPD in the Observational Community were greater than those in the Control Community(P<0.05). In the Control Community, FEV(1)、FEV(1) %Pred had no significant difference before and after experiment(P>0.05). In the Observational Community, 6MWD, standard treatment rate and exercises>3 days per week were significantly greater than before(550.5±76.0 vs. 474.7±75.9, 64.4% vs. 8.9%, 100% vs. 22.2%, respectively, P<0.05) and greater than those in the Control Community(550.5±76.0 vs. 404.5±56.7, 64.4% vs. 10.3%, 100% vs. 30.8%, respectively, P<0.05), acute exacerbation was significantly less than before (4.4% vs. 17.8%, P<0.05). In the Control Unit, 6MWD was significantly less than before (404.5±56.7 vs. 469.8±58.5, P<0.05). Conclusions: The COPD community integrated management system can play a great role in community integrated prevention for COPD.
目的:建立适合我国国情的慢阻肺社区综合防治管理平台,并评估其在慢阻肺综合防治中的效果。 方法:基于电子管理系统建立慢阻肺社区综合防治管理平台,包括慢阻肺的初筛、电子健康档案、慢阻肺分级管理与双向转诊等功能模块。在粤北农村以抽签法随机选取2个乡镇作为实验和对照社区,两社区均选择常驻家庭,每户随机选取1位≥40岁居民纳入试验,随访观察2年。实验社区入选人数460例,实际完成2年管理和随访340例,其中慢阻肺患者45例、高危人群117例和一般人群178例;对照社区入选380例,实际回访212例,其中慢阻肺患者39例、高危人群68例和一般人群105例。在实验社区基于慢阻肺社区综合防治管理平台开展慢阻肺初筛、分级管理和双向转诊等卫生服务。对照社区仅提供基本诊断与治疗服务。通过比较两个社区中人群的肺功能变化、急性加重情况、生活质量和危险因素改变情况等,以评价该管理平台的效果。 结果:实验社区的随访率、戒烟率、现吸烟中吸烟量减少者、被动吸烟减少者和改用清洁能源烹饪者占比均显著高于对照社区(分别为73.9%和55.8%,70.8%和9.1%,24.2%和7.1%,32.6%和3.5%,67.8%和3.2%,P<0.05)。实验后实验社区的人群在"了解慢阻肺" 、 "慢阻肺常见症状" 、 "慢阻肺是否可以防治"和"肺功能检查"等知晓率均较实验前升高(分别为84.7%和30.0%,76.4%和7.6%,71.5%和6.8%,72.1%和27.4%,P<0.05),且明显高于对照社区(分别为84.7%和73.6%,76.4%和9.4%,71.5%和7.1%,72.1%和32.5%,P<0.05)。实验社区慢阻肺患者的FEV(1)、FEV(1)占预计值%较实验前显著增加(分别为1.88±0.71和1.74±0.64, 75.6±25.0和69.4±20.5,P<0.05);实验社区GOLD 1级慢阻肺患者实验前后FEV(1)和FEV(1)占预计值%的差值显著大于对照社区(分别为0.17±0.24和-0.09±0.33, 10.7±15.3和-1.0±16.4,P<0.05)。对照社区慢阻肺患者的FEV(1)、FEV(1)占预计值%在实验前后差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验社区慢阻肺患者的6 min步行距离、规范治疗率和运动锻炼>3 d/周较实验前显著增加(分别为550.5±76.0和474.7±75.9, 64.4%和8.9%, 100%和22.2%,P<0.05),且大于对照社区(分别为550.5±76.0和404.5±56.7, 64.4%和10.3%, 100%和30.8%,P<0.05),每年急性加重人数较前显著减少(4.4%和17.8%,P<0.05);对照社区的6 min步行距离较实验前显著减少(404.5±56.7和469.8±58.5,P<0.05)。 结论:该慢阻肺社区综合防治管理平台在社区居民慢阻肺综合防治中能够发挥较好的作用。.
Keywords: Community; Management; Management system; Pulmonary disease chronic obstructive.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
