Municipal resources and patient outcomes through the first year after a hip fracture
- PMID: 28209152
- PMCID: PMC5314693
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2087-5
Municipal resources and patient outcomes through the first year after a hip fracture
Abstract
Background: Hip fractures represent major critical events for older people, and put huge demands on economic and personnel resources. Most hip fracture patients are in need of postoperative rehabilitation services. Through the Coordination Reform, the municipalities in Norway were given increased responsibility for community-based treatment and rehabilitation after surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between municipal resources and patient outcomes through the first year after a hip fracture, focusing on survival and health-related quality of life.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide cohort study on people experiencing a hip fracture in 2011-2012 in Norway, with a 1-year follow-up. We obtained data on date of hip fracture, demographics, total morbidity (ASA) score, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3 L), date of death if applicable, municipality of residence (Norwegian Hip Fracture Register), date of hospital readmission due to complications (Norwegian Patient Register), and information on municipalities' characteristics (Municipality-State-Reporting).
Results: The study population comprised 15,757 patients, mean age 80.8 years, 68.6% women. All-cause mortality was 8.6% at 30 days, and 25.3% at 12 months. Mortality was lower in the municipalities with the highest overall staff time for rehabilitation. A high proportion of the population aged 80+, was associated with low rates of self-reported anxiety/depression 12 months after surgery, as well as higher general health scores (EQ-5D VAS). There were no other differences in outcome according to rehabilitation resources, when comparing municipalities with the highest and lowest staffing.
Conclusion: The study revealed no substantial impact of municipal resources on survival and health-related quality of life through the first year after a hip fracture. To evaluate major organizational changes and allocate resources according to best practice, there is a need to monitor health outcomes and use of resources over time through reliable measures, including variables related to coordination between services.
Keywords: Health services; Hip fracture; Municipal resources; Quality of life; Survival.
Similar articles
-
Quality of life following hip fractures: results from the Norwegian hip fracture register.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 7;17:265. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1111-y. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016. PMID: 27387741 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of socioeconomic position on patient-reported outcome measures following hip fractures - a register-based observational study on 35,206 patients from the Norwegian hip fracture register 2014-2018.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 May 4;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02377-9. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025. PMID: 40320519 Free PMC article.
-
The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register: experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations.Acta Orthop. 2008 Oct;79(5):583-93. doi: 10.1080/17453670810016588. Acta Orthop. 2008. PMID: 18839363
-
Patients' perceptions of rehabilitation in the community following hip fracture surgery. A qualitative thematic synthesis.Physiotherapy. 2020 Sep;108:63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 19. Physiotherapy. 2020. PMID: 32711229 Review.
-
Hip fracture has profound psychosocial impacts: a systematic review of qualitative studies.Age Ageing. 2024 Sep 1;53(9):afae194. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae194. Age Ageing. 2024. PMID: 39238124 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The impact of hip fracture on health-related quality of life and activities of daily living: the SPARE-HIP prospective cohort study.Arch Osteoporos. 2019 May 29;14(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0607-0. Arch Osteoporos. 2019. PMID: 31144117 Free PMC article.
-
Post-discharge complications in postoperative patients with hip fracture.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Oct 24;14:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.045. eCollection 2021 Mar. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020. PMID: 33717891 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality of life after hip fracture: a 12-month prospective study.PeerJ. 2020 Jun 16;8:e9215. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9215. eCollection 2020. PeerJ. 2020. PMID: 32587793 Free PMC article.
-
Regional variation of care dependency after hip fracture in Germany: A retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims data.PLoS One. 2020 Mar 23;15(3):e0230648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230648. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32203564 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Frihagen F, Waaler GM, Madsen JE, Nordsletten L, Aspaas S, Aas E. The cost of hemiarthroplasty compared to that of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures. 2-year results involving 222 patients based on a randomized controlled trial. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:446–452. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.492763. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Prestmo A, Hagen G, Sletvold O, Helbostad JL, Thingstad P, Taraldsen K, Lydersen S, Halsteinli V, Saltnes T, Lamb SE, Johnsen LG, Saltvedt I. Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:1623–1633. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62409-0. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Solbakken SM, Magnus JH, Meyer HE, Emaus N, Tell GS, Holvik K, Grimnes G, Forsmo S, Schei B, Søgaard AJ, Omsland TK. Impact of comorbidity, age, and gender on seasonal variation in hip fracture incidence. A NOREPOS study. Arch Osteoporos. 2014. doi:10.1007/s11657-014-0191-2. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical