Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):146.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2083-9.

Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of genetic carrier screening in a changing landscape

Affiliations

Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of genetic carrier screening in a changing landscape

Kim C A Holtkamp et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In most countries, genetic carrier screening is neither offered, nor embedded in mainstream healthcare. Technological developments have triggered a two-fold transition in carrier screening: the expansion from screening one single disorder to many disorders simultaneously, and offering screening universally, regardless of ancestry. This study aims to identify general and population-specific barriers and needs reflected by stakeholders regarding the implementation of carrier screening in a changing landscape.

Methods: Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with Dutch key stakeholders working in the practical and scientific field of carrier screening. The constellation approach was used to categorise barriers and needs into three levels: culture, structure and practice.

Results: Barriers on a cultural level include: undecidedness about the desirability of carrier screening, and a lack of priority of screening in mainstream healthcare. On a structural level barriers included: need for organisational structures in healthcare for embedding carrier screening, need for guidelines, financial structures, practical tools for overcoming challenges during counselling, and a need for training and education of both professionals and the public. A lack of demand for screening by the public, and a need for a division of responsibilities were barriers on a practical level.

Conclusion: The absence of a collective sense of urgency for genetic carrier screening, a lack of organisational structures, and uncertainty or even disagreement about the responsibilities seem to be important barriers in the implementation of carrier screening. Stakeholders therefore suggest that change agents should be formally acknowledged to strategically plan broadening of current initiatives and attune different stakeholders.

Keywords: Barriers; Carrier screening; Expanded universal carrier screening; Implementation; Interviews; Needs; Stakeholders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Interviewees categorised by the four different stakeholder groups in the Network of Actors model (adapted from [26]). 1One stakeholder is a researcher and a midwife, but is only assigned to the scientists/researchers group

References

    1. Henneman L, Borry P, Chokoshvili D, Cornel MC, van El CG, Forzano F, et al. Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:e1–e12. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.271. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Wert G, Dondorp WJ, Knoppers BM. Preconception care and genetic risk: ethical issues. J Community Genet. 2012;3:221–228. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0074-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaback MM. Screening and prevention in Tay-sachs disease: origins, update, and impact. Adv Genet. 2001;44:253–265. - PubMed
    1. NHS . Sickle cell and thalassaemia, handbook for laboratories. 3 2012.
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee opinion no. 486. Update on carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:1028–1031. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821922c2. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms