Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;18(2):181-188.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.32042. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

Use of Physician-in-Triage Model in the Management of Abdominal Pain in an Emergency Department Observation Unit

Affiliations

Use of Physician-in-Triage Model in the Management of Abdominal Pain in an Emergency Department Observation Unit

John R Marshall et al. West J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Given the nationwide increase in emergency department (ED) visits it is of paramount importance for hospitals to find efficient ways to manage patient flow. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a significant difference in success rates, length of stay (LOS), and other demographic factors in two cohorts of patients admitted directly to an ED observation unit (EDOU) under an abdominal pain protocol by a physician in triage (bypassing the main ED) versus those admitted via the traditional pathway (evaluated and treated in the main ED prior to EDOU admission).

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a protocol-driven EDOU with a diagnosis of abdominal pain in a single university hospital center ED. We obtained compiled data for all patients admitted to the EDOU with a diagnosis of abdominal pain that met EDOU protocol admission criteria. We divided data for each cohort into age, gender, payer status, and LOS. The data were then analyzed to assess any significant differences between the cohorts.

Results: A total of 327 patients were eligible for this study (85 triage group, 242 main ED group). The total success rate was 90.8% (n=297) and failure rate was 9.2% (n=30). We observed no significant differences in success rates between those dispositioned to the EDOU by triage physicians (90.6%) and those via the traditional route (90.5 % p) = 0.98. However, we found a significant difference between the two groups regarding total LOS with significantly shorter main ED times and EDOU times among patients sent to the EDOU by the physician-in-triage group (p< .001).

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in EDOU disposition outcomes in patients admitted to an EDOU by a physician-in-triage or via the traditional route. However, there were statistically significant shorter LOSs in patients admitted to the EDOU by triage physicians. The data from this study support the implementation of a physician-in-triage model in combination with the EDOU in improving efficiency in the treatment of abdominal pain. This knowledge may spur action to cut healthcare costs and improve patient flow and timely decision-making in hospitals with EDOUs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. The authors disclosed none.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Emergency department observation unit (EDOU) management of abdominal pain.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of overall success rate (discharge home within 24 hours) of main ED vs triage.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Success rates (discharge home within 24 hours) between genders, ages, and payer sources. VA, Veterans Administration.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of success rates (discharge home within 24 hours) of ages, gender, and payer sources betwen main ED and triage. VA, Veterans Administration.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Data comparing length of stay (LOS) data in main emergeny department (in hours) vs emergency department observation unit (EDOU).

References

    1. 2015 ACEP Poll Affordable Care Act Research Results. Mar, 2015. [Accessed Jul 10, 2016]. Prepared for: ACEP. Available at: http://newsroom.acep.org/statistics_and_reports?item=30102.
    1. Baugh CW, Venkatesh AK, Bohan JS. Emergency department observation units: A clinical and financial benefit for hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev. 2011;36(1):28–37. - PubMed
    1. Baugh CW, Liang LJ, Probst MA, et al. National cost savings from observation unit management of syncope. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(8):934–41. - PubMed
    1. Capp R, Sun B, Boatright D, et al. The impact of emergency department observation units on United States emergency department admission rates. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(11):738–42. - PubMed
    1. Galipeau J, Pussegoda K, Stevens A, et al. Effectiveness and safety of short-stay units in the emergency department: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(8):893–907. - PubMed

MeSH terms