Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Mar;10(1):73-76.
doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584402. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

Reconstruction of a Combined Maxillectomy and Segmental Mandibulectomy Defect in a Seven-Year-Old with a Single Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap

Affiliations
Case Reports

Reconstruction of a Combined Maxillectomy and Segmental Mandibulectomy Defect in a Seven-Year-Old with a Single Free Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap

Shawn T Joseph et al. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Combined upper alveolectomy and segmental mandibulectomy are complex defects. Reconstruction of these defects is usually suboptimal. We describe the case of a pediatric patient with vessel-depleted neck with recurrent vascular malformation involving the ramus and coronoid process of mandible and a previous history of maxillectomy and a reconstruction with anterolateral thigh flap. The patient underwent wide resection. The defects involving the upper alveolus and mandible were simultaneously reconstructed with a single free fibula flap.

Keywords: combined maxilla and mandible defect; fibula flap; mandibular reconstruction; maxillary reconstruction; pediatric patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preoperative frontal view photograph of the patient, prior to the latest surgery.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Three dimensional CT scan with angiogram showing the lesion involving the ramus and coronoid region of left hemi-mandible with feeders from left external carotid artery.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Postresection photograph showing segmental mandibulectomy defect, with preservation of a part of vertical ramus and condyle to which the plate has been attached. Note the upper alveolus defect, which has been reconstructed only with a soft-tissue flap.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fibula flap with the design for reconstruction. The intervening bone segment has been removed keeping the periosteum in continuity.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Flap inset has been done to reconstruct the defect. The upper segment of the fibula has been fixed to the upper alveolus stump and the lower segments used to reconstruct the mandible.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Endoscopic view of oral cavity showing the status 6 months postoperatively.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Frontal view of the patient 24 months after surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thankappan K, Trivedi N P, Subash P. et al.Three-dimensional computed tomography-based contouring of a free fibula bone graft for mandibular reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(10):2185–2192. - PubMed
    1. Punpale A S, Rajendra Prasad J S, Shetty K P, Kadam S, Udupa V. An innovative design for simultaneous reconstruction of complex maxillo-mandibular defects with single free fibula osteocutaneous flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(1):96–101. - PubMed
    1. Laure B, Sury F, Martin T, Chabut A, Goga D. Reconstruction of bony mandibular and maxillary defects with one single transfer of a free fibula osteocutaneous flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(2):200–203. - PubMed
    1. Sadove R C, Powell L A. Simultaneous maxillary and mandibular reconstruction with one free osteocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(1):141–146. - PubMed
    1. Ozkan O, Ozgentas H E, Dikici M B. Simultaneous reconstruction of large maxillary and mandibular defects with a fibular osteocutaneous flap combined with an anterolateral thigh flap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2004;20(6):451–455. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources