Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 30;4(12):2325967116679393.
doi: 10.1177/2325967116679393. eCollection 2016 Dec.

Research Productivity of Sports Medicine Fellowship Faculty

Gregory L Cvetanovich  1 , Bryan M Saltzman  1 , Peter N Chalmers  2 , Rachel M Frank  1 , Brian J Cole  1 , Bernard R Bach Jr  1
Affiliations

Research Productivity of Sports Medicine Fellowship Faculty

Gregory L Cvetanovich et al. Orthop J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: Research productivity is considered an important factor in academic advancement in sports medicine. No study to date has evaluated academic productivity and correlates of academic rank for sports medicine fellowship faculty.

Purpose: To describe the academic productivity of American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) fellowship program faculty and to determine the association between academic productivity, fellowship characteristics, and academic rank.

Study design: Descriptive epidemiology study.

Methods: Characteristics of orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship programs were obtained from the AOSSM and program websites. Metrics of academic productivity (Hirsch index [h index], I-10 index, publications, citations, and number of publications in several journals) were obtained from Scopus. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine whether academic productivity differs with fellowship attributes and academic rank.

Results: A total of 90 AOSSM sports medicine fellowship programs with 610 associated faculty members were identified. Faculty were predominantly male (94%), at academic medical centers (74%), members of AOSSM (71%), and sports medicine-fellowship trained (84%). Faculty had a median of 18 (range, 0-684) publications overall, including a median of 3 (range, 0-161) publications since 2012. All measures of academic productivity were significantly higher among faculty employed at academic medical centers compared with those not employed at academic centers (P < .05 in all cases). On multivariate ordinal regression analysis, the best correlates of higher academic rank were higher cumulative h index (1.22; P < .001) and longer time in practice since fellowship (1.14; P < .001), which predicted 63.8% of the variance in academic rank. Fellowships with a larger number of fellows had more publications and citations per faculty member, higher faculty cumulative h index, and more publications in the American Journal of Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy per faculty member (P < .017). Regional differences were present, with the Northeast fellowship faculty the most productive, followed by the Midwest.

Conclusion: Higher cumulative h index and more years in practice were the best correlates of higher academic rank among AOSSM sports medicine fellowship faculty. Research productivity was higher among faculty employed at academic centers in the Northeast and Midwest regions and at programs with a larger number of fellows.

Keywords: AOSSM; academic productivity; academic rank; fellowship; h index; sports medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: B.R.B. receives research support from Arthrex Inc, Conmed Linvatec, DJ Orthopaedics, Ossur, Smith & Nephew, and Tornier. B.J.C. receives research support from Aesculap/B.Braun, Arthrex Inc, Cytori, Medipost, National Institutes of Health, and Zimmer; other financial or material support from Athletico, Ossur, Smith & Nephew, and Tornier; is a paid consultant for Athrex Inc, Regentis, and Zimmer; holds stock or stock options in Carticept, Regentis; and receives royalties from Arthrex Inc, DJ Orthopaedics, and Elsevier.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean total number of publications, cumulative h index, and maximum citations of a single work for assistant, associate, and full professors. Errors bar demonstrate 95% CI. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in each case (P < .001).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Benway BM, Kalidas P, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB. Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology. 2009;74:30–33. - PubMed
    1. Cvetanovich GL, Fillingham YA, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Verma NN, Bach BR. Publication and level of evidence trends in the American Journal of Sports Medicine from 1996 to 2011. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:220–225. - PubMed
    1. Eloy JA, Svider P, Chandrasekhar SS, et al. Gender disparities in scholarly productivity within academic otolaryngology departments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148:215–222. - PubMed
    1. Gast KM, Kuzon WM, Adelman EE, Waljee JF. Influence of training institution on academic affiliation and productivity among plastic surgery faculty in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:570–578. - PubMed
    1. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16569–16572. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources