Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan;18(1):8.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0651-5.

Surgical Margins in Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Surgical Margins in Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Dean D Laganosky et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

The oncologic impact of positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery is controversial. Herein, we discuss current data surrounding surgical margins in the operative management of renal cell carcinoma. The prevalence, risk factors, outcomes, and subsequent management of positive surgical margins will be reviewed. Literature suggests that the prevalence of positive surgical margins following kidney surgery varies by practice setting, tumor characteristics, and operation type. For patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery, it is not necessary to remove a margin of healthy tissue. Tumor enucleation may be appropriate and is associated with comparable outcomes. Reflexive intraoperative frozen section use does not provide beneficial information and many patients with positive margins can be monitored closely with serial imaging. The impact of positive surgical margins on recurrence and survival remains conflicting. Though every effort must be performed to obtain negative margins, a positive surgical margin appears to have a marginal impact on recurrence and survival.

Keywords: Nephron-sparing surgery; Partial nephrectomy; Positive surgical margins; Renal cell carcinoma; Renal tumor; Tumor enucleation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Urol. 2016 Feb;195(2):264-9 - PubMed
    1. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct;18(5):905-9 - PubMed
    1. Urol Oncol. 2014 Aug;32(6):864-8 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):47-50; discussion 50 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):415-22 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources