Comparison of the new Japanese legislation for expedited approval of regenerative medicine products with the existing systems in the USA and European Union
- PMID: 28211195
- PMCID: PMC5836905
- DOI: 10.1002/term.2428
Comparison of the new Japanese legislation for expedited approval of regenerative medicine products with the existing systems in the USA and European Union
Abstract
Legislation for expedited-approval pathways and programmes for drugs, biologics or medical devices has been enacted for rapid commercialization of innovative products in the United States of America (USA) and the European Union (EU). However, less innovative products are increasingly benefitting from these expedited-approval pathways, and obligations to collect and report post-marketing data on approved products are being bypassed frequently. The Japanese government recently enacted legislation for a new conditional and time-limited approval pathway dedicated to regenerative medicine products. The current study examines this new legislation and compares it with existing US and EU regulatory frameworks, with a particular focus on how it addresses the limitations of existing systems. Regulations, guidance documents and approval information were gathered from the websites of the respective authorities in the USA, the EU and Japan, and the systems were categorized through qualitative analysis. The pathways and programmes from each region were categorized into four groups, based on the requirement of pre- or post-marketing clinical data. Expedited-approval pathways in the USA and the EU provide similar qualification criteria, such as severity of target disease; however, such criteria are not specified for the new pathway in Japan. Only the Japanese pathway stipulates a time limitation on exceptional approval, requiring post-marketing study for conditional and time-limited products. Continuous improvement is necessary to solve previously addressed issues within the expedited-approval pathways and programmes and to ensure that innovative medical products are rigourously screened, but also readily available to patients in need. The time limitation of conditional approval could be a potential solution to some of these problems. Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Tissue Engineering Regenerative Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: expedited-approval pathway; post-marketing; pre-marketing; regenerative medicine product; regulatory approval; unmet medical need.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Tissue Engineering Regenerative Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Analysis and comparative evaluation of expedited programs for gene therapy products: insights from the United States, the European Union, Japan, and South Korea.Gene Ther. 2024 May;31(5-6):242-254. doi: 10.1038/s41434-023-00437-7. Epub 2024 Jan 10. Gene Ther. 2024. PMID: 38200263
-
A decade of marketing approval of gene and cell-based therapies in the United States, European Union and Japan: An evaluation of regulatory decision-making.Cytotherapy. 2018 Jun;20(6):769-778. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.03.038. Epub 2018 May 2. Cytotherapy. 2018. PMID: 29730080
-
Post-marketing surveillance framework of cell and gene therapy products in the European Union, the United States, Japan, South Korea and China: a comparative study.BMC Med. 2024 Sep 27;22(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03637-z. BMC Med. 2024. PMID: 39334246 Free PMC article.
-
Regulatory approval pathways for anticancer drugs in Japan, the EU and the US.Int J Hematol. 2016 Jul;104(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s12185-016-2001-7. Epub 2016 Apr 15. Int J Hematol. 2016. PMID: 27084259 Review.
-
Regulatory and clinical development to support the approval of advanced therapies medicinal products in Japan.Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2022 Jul;22(7):831-842. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2093637. Epub 2022 Jul 4. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2022. PMID: 35762253 Review.
Cited by
-
Global regulatory progress in delivering on the promise of gene therapies for unmet medical needs.Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2021 Apr 5;21:524-529. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2021.04.001. eCollection 2021 Jun 11. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2021. PMID: 33997101 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in regenerative therapy: A review of the literature and future directions.Regen Ther. 2020 Feb 20;14:136-153. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2020.01.004. eCollection 2020 Jun. Regen Ther. 2020. PMID: 32110683 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors affecting the feasibility of post-authorisation RCTs for conditionally authorised anticancer medicines: a multistakeholder perspective from a qualitative focus group study.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 9;14(11):e084483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084483. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39521472 Free PMC article.
-
Liver tissue engineering: From implantable tissue to whole organ engineering.Hepatol Commun. 2017 Dec 21;2(2):131-141. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1136. eCollection 2018 Feb. Hepatol Commun. 2017. PMID: 29404520 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Analysis and comparative evaluation of expedited programs for gene therapy products: insights from the United States, the European Union, Japan, and South Korea.Gene Ther. 2024 May;31(5-6):242-254. doi: 10.1038/s41434-023-00437-7. Epub 2024 Jan 10. Gene Ther. 2024. PMID: 38200263
References
-
- Banzi R, Gerardi C, Bertele V , et al. 2015; Approvals of drugs with uncertain benefit‐risk profiles in Europe. Eur J Intern Med 26: 572–584. - PubMed
-
- Boucaud‐Maitre D, Altman JJ. 2016; Do the EMA accelerated assessment procedure and the FDA priority review ensure a therapeutic added value? 2006‐2015: a cohort study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 72: 1275–1281. - PubMed
-
- Darrow JJ, Avorn J, Kesselheim AS. 2014; New FDA breakthrough‐drug category‐‐implications for patients. N Engl J Med 370: 1252–1258. - PubMed
-
- Dhruva SS, Redberg RF. 2010; Accelerated approval and possible withdrawal of midodrine. JAMA 304: 2172–2173. - PubMed
-
- Editorials. 2015, Stem the tide. Nature 528: 163. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources