Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;187(4):465-475.
doi: 10.1667/RR008CC.1. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

Mice and the A-Bomb: Irradiation Systems for Realistic Exposure Scenarios

Guy Garty  1 , Yanping Xu  1 , Carl Elliston  2 , Stephen A Marino  1 , Gerhard Randers-Pehrson  1 , David J Brenner  2
Affiliations

Mice and the A-Bomb: Irradiation Systems for Realistic Exposure Scenarios

Guy Garty et al. Radiat Res. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Validation of biodosimetry assays is normally performed with acute exposures to uniform external photon fields. Realistically, exposure to a radiological dispersal device or reactor leak will include exposure to low dose rates and likely exposure to ingested radionuclides. An improvised nuclear device will likely include a significant neutron component in addition to a mixture of high- and low-dose-rate photons and ingested radionuclides. We present here several novel irradiation systems developed at the Center for High Throughput Minimally Invasive Radiation Biodosimetry to provide more realistic exposures for testing of novel biodosimetric assays. These irradiators provide a wide range of dose rates (from Gy/s to Gy/week) as well as mixed neutron/photon fields mimicking an improvised nuclear device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Scenarios involving radiation exposure to the general population.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Comparison of a pure fission spectrum (solid line) and the spectrum from “Little Boy”. Data reproduced from ref. (40).
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
Panel a: The neutron irradiation facility [Reproduced with permission from (13)]. Panel b: Sample tube for irradiating mice. Panel c: Sample tube, containing human blood for ex vivo irradiations.
FIG. 4
FIG. 4
Low-dose-rate irradiation chamber for (panel a) blood and (panel b) mice.
FIG. 5
FIG. 5
Biokinetics of cesium in mouse and man. The full circles represent the time dependent dose rate from ingested 137Cs, as per the model described in (10). Open circles are from our own data based on total body counting in mice (49).
FIG. 6
FIG. 6
Ultra-low-dose-rate irradiation system under construction.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Grace MB, Moyer BR, Prasher J, Cliffer KD, Ramakrishnan N, Kaminski J, et al. Rapid Radiation Dose Assessment for Radiological Public Health Emergencies: Role of NIAID and BARDA. Health Phys. 2010;98(2):172–78. - PubMed
    1. Biological and Environmental Effects of Nuclear War, Summary-Analysis of Hearings. Joint Committee on Atomic Energy. Place Government Printing Office: Government Printing Office; 1959.
    1. Survival of the Relocated Population of the U.S. after a Nuclear Attack. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1976. Report No. ORNL-5041. ( http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifie...)
    1. Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, United States Senate Place U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Government Printing Office; 1980. Short- and Long-Term Health Effects of the Surviving Population of a Nuclear War.
    1. Sidel VW, Geiger HJ, Lown B. The physician’s role in the postattack period. New Eng J Med. 1962;266(22):1137–45. - PubMed

Publication types