Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 17;12(2):e0172422.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172422. eCollection 2017.

Colour preferences of UK garden birds at supplementary seed feeders

Affiliations

Colour preferences of UK garden birds at supplementary seed feeders

Luke Rothery et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Supplementary feeding of garden birds generally has benefits for both bird populations and human wellbeing. Birds have excellent colour vision, and show preferences for food items of particular colours, but research into colour preferences associated with artificial feeders is limited to hummingbirds. Here, we investigated the colour preferences of common UK garden birds foraging at seed-dispensing artificial feeders containing identical food. We presented birds simultaneously with an array of eight differently coloured feeders, and recorded the number of visits made to each colour over 370 30-minute observation periods in the winter of 2014/15. In addition, we surveyed visitors to a garden centre and science festival to determine the colour preferences of likely purchasers of seed feeders. Our results suggest that silver and green feeders were visited by higher numbers of individuals of several common garden bird species, while red and yellow feeders received fewer visits. In contrast, people preferred red, yellow, blue and green feeders. We suggest that green feeders may be simultaneously marketable and attractive to foraging birds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Consumables/travel funding was received from Westland Horticulture to carry out the research. The funders specified the initial research question but played no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Analysis of feeder colour.
(A) RG and BY ratios, and (B) luminance for the 8 different feeder colours.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Bird colour preferences.
Mean numbers of visits per observation period to feeders of each colour, for (A) all species combined, (B) Blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus (C) Great tit Parus major (D) Coal tit Periparus ater (E) House sparrow Passer domesticus and (F) Robin Erithacus rubecula. Error bars represent +/- 1 S.E.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Human colour preferences.
(A) Mean number of tokens placed into the container corresponding to each coloured feeder by potential purchasers of bird feeders. (B) The combined preferences of potential purchasers (x axis) and visits by all birds (y axis) for each colour feeder. Error bars represent +/- 1 S.E.

References

    1. Fuller RA, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Barbosa O, Gaston KJ. Garden bird feeding predicts the structure of urban avian assemblages. Divers Distrib. 2008;14: 131–137.
    1. Galbraith JA, Beggs JR, Jones DN, Stanley MC. Supplementary feeding restructures urban bird communities. P Natl Acad Sci. National Acad Sciences; 2015;112: E2648–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). Working with the grain of nature: A biodiversity strategy for England. London; 2002;: 180.
    1. Davies ZG, Fuller RA, Loram A, Irvine KN, Sims V, Gaston KJ. A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biol Cons. 2009;142: 761–771.
    1. Pet Food Manufacturers' Association. Annual Report 2015. In: www.pfma.org.ukannual-reports. 2015.

LinkOut - more resources