Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Mar 18;389(10074):1124-1132.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32055-4. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

Educating religious leaders to promote uptake of male circumcision in Tanzania: a cluster randomised trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Educating religious leaders to promote uptake of male circumcision in Tanzania: a cluster randomised trial

Jennifer A Downs et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Male circumcision is being widely deployed as an HIV prevention strategy in countries with high HIV incidence, but its uptake in sub-Saharan Africa has been below targets. We did a study to establish whether educating religious leaders about male circumcision would increase uptake in their village.

Methods: In this cluster randomised trial in northwest Tanzania, eligible villages were paired by proximity (<60 km) and the time that a free male circumcision outreach campaign from the Tanzanian Ministry of Health became available in their village. All villages received the standard male circumcision outreach activities provided by the Ministry of Health. Within the village pairs, villages were randomly assigned by coin toss to receive either additional education for Christian church leaders on scientific, religious, and cultural aspects of male circumcision (intervention group), or standard outreach only (control group). Church leaders or their congregations were not masked to random assignment. The educational intervention consisted of a 1-day seminar co-taught by a Tanzanian pastor and a Tanzanian clinician who worked with the Ministry of Health, and meetings with the study team every 2 weeks thereafter, for the duration of the circumcision campaign. The primary outcome was the proportion of male individuals in a village who were circumcised during the campaign, using an intention-to-treat analysis that included all men in the village. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT 02167776.

Findings: Between June 15, 2014, and Dec 10, 2015, we provided education for church leaders in eight intervention villages and compared the outcomes with those in eight control villages. In the intervention villages, 52·8% (30 889 of 58 536) of men were circumcised compared with 29·5% (25 484 of 86 492) of men in the eight control villages (odds ratio 3·2 [95% CI, 1·4-7·3]; p=0·006).

Interpretation: Education of religious leaders had a substantial effect on uptake of male circumcision, and should be considered as part of male circumcision programmes in other sub-Saharan African countries. This study was conducted in one region in Tanzania; however, we believe that our intervention is generalisable. We equipped church leaders with knowledge and tools, and ultimately each leader established the most culturally-appropriate way to promote male circumcision. Therefore, we think that the process of working through religious leaders can serve as an innovative model to promote healthy behaviour, leading to HIV prevention and other clinically relevant outcomes, in a variety of settings.

Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and the Mulago Foundation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention and control villages selected for the cluster randomised trial in northwest Tanzania Intervention villages, shown in blue, were paired with control villages, shown in red, by proximity (within 60 km) and timing of the male circumcision outreach campaign. Black lines on map indicate paired villages.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of community randomisation All men in all villages, based on the 2012 Tanzanian census data, were included in the analysis with no individual losses or exclusions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of total male population circumcised during outreach campaign, by village pairs

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegfried N, Muller M, Deeks J, Volmink J. Male circumcision for prevention of heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2 CD003362. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e298. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369:643–656. - PubMed
    1. Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;369:657–666. - PubMed
    1. WHO Male circumcision for HIV Prevention. HIV/AIDS. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/ (accessed May 5, 2016).

Publication types