Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb;18(2):9.
doi: 10.1007/s11864-017-0453-5.

BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: What Is the Optimal Strategy for Treatment?

Affiliations
Review

BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: What Is the Optimal Strategy for Treatment?

Romain Cohen et al. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

The BRAF activating mutation, harbored by approximately 10% of colorectal cancers (CRC), confers dramatic prognosis to advanced diseases. In early-stage setting, the identification of the BRAF mutation does not impact the therapeutic decision. Yet, the BRAF mutation could be considered as a stratification factor in adjuvant trials, because of its prognostic impact after relapse. Moreover, both BRAF mutation and mismatch repair (MMR) statuses should be determined in all CRC to help identify sporadic tumors versus Lynch syndrome-related tumors. Indeed, in patients with MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors and MLH1 loss of expression, the BRAFV600E mutation indicates a sporadic origin. In advanced BRAF-mutated CRC, the standard of care remains fluoropyrimidine-based cytotoxic regimen in combination with bevacizumab. Although a recent meta-analysis showed that there was insufficient data to justify the exclusion of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, antiangiogenic agents should be preferred in the first-line setting. Despite the lack of a randomized phase 3 study dedicated to BRAF-mutated CRC, chemotherapy intensification combining a quadruple association of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI), and bevacizumab seems like a valid option. Although first results with BRAF inhibitors as single agents in BRAF-mutated CRC were disappointing, their association with therapies targeting the MAPK pathway seems to overcome the primary resistance to BRAF inhibition. In the field of sporadic CRC, the BRAF mutation is strongly associated with MMR deficiency. Considering breakthrough results of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR repair tumors, determination of the MMR status appears to be mandatory. Given the dramatic prognosis conferred by the BRAF mutation, patients with BRAF-mutated advanced CRC need to be systematically identified and proposed for clinical trial enrolment in order to benefit from innovative therapies.

Keywords: BRAFV600E; Checkpoint inhibitor; Colorectal cancer; Dabrafenib; FOLFOXIRI; Microsatellite instability; Vemurafenib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Oncol. 2004 Dec;15(12):1766-72 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 10;33(35):4176-87 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):4032-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):726-36 - PubMed
    1. Int J Cancer. 2013 Oct 1;133(7):1624-30 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources