The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception
- PMID: 28215214
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X17000309
The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception
Abstract
Why are negative emotions so central in art reception far beyond tragedy? Revisiting classical aesthetics in the light of recent psychological research, we present a novel model to explain this much discussed (apparent) paradox. We argue that negative emotions are an important resource for the arts in general, rather than a special license for exceptional art forms only. The underlying rationale is that negative emotions have been shown to be particularly powerful in securing attention, intense emotional involvement, and high memorability, and hence is precisely what artworks strive for. Two groups of processing mechanisms are identified that conjointly adopt the particular powers of negative emotions for art's purposes. The first group consists of psychological distancing mechanisms that are activated along with the cognitive schemata of art, representation, and fiction. These schemata imply personal safety and control over continuing or discontinuing exposure to artworks, thereby preventing negative emotions from becoming outright incompatible with expectations of enjoyment. This distancing sets the stage for a second group of processing components that allow art recipients to positively embrace the experiencing of negative emotions, thereby rendering art reception more intense, more interesting, more emotionally moving, more profound, and occasionally even more beautiful. These components include compositional interplays of positive and negative emotions, the effects of aesthetic virtues of using the media of (re)presentation (musical sound, words/language, color, shapes) on emotion perception, and meaning-making efforts. Moreover, our Distancing-Embracing model proposes that concomitant mixed emotions often help integrate negative emotions into altogether pleasurable trajectories.
Keywords: aesthetic enjoyment; aesthetic virtues; art schema; genre effects; interplays of positive and negative emotions; meaning making; mixed emotions.
Comment in
-
A social dimension to enjoyment of negative emotion in art reception.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e352. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001601. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342774
-
Reconciling an underlying contradiction in the Distancing-Embracing model.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e356. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001649. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342776
-
Positivity versus negativity is a matter of timing.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e348. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001571. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342777
-
Considering the filmmaker: Intensified continuity, narrative structure, and the Distancing-Embracing model.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e349. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001583. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342778
-
Emotional granularity and the musical enjoyment of sadness itself.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e351. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001595. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342779
-
The urge to judge: Why the judgmental attitude has anything to do with the aesthetic enjoyment of negative emotions.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e353. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001613. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342780
-
Orange is the new aesthetic.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e355. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001637. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342781
-
Distancing, not embracing, the Distancing-Embracing model of art reception.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e357. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001650. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342782
-
Boredom in art.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e359. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001674. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342783
-
You are not alone - Social sharing as a necessary addition to the Embracing factor.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e358. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001662. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342784
-
Fiction as a bridge to action.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e363. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001716. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342786
-
Empathy as a guide for understanding the balancing of Distancing-Embracing with negative art.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e361. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001698. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342787
-
Art enhances meaning by stimulating integrative complexity and aesthetic interest.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e364. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001728. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342789
-
Context matters: How macroeconomic forces may alter the reception of negative emotions in art.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e365. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1700173X. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342790
-
"Negative emotions" live in stories, not in the hearts of readers who enjoy them.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e367. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001753. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342791
-
What is art and how does it differ from aesthetics?Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e368. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001765. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342792
-
The paradox of tragedy and emotional response to simulation.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e366. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001741. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342793
-
Psychological models of art reception must be empirically grounded.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e371. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001790. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342795
-
Art and fiction are signals with indeterminate truth values.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e373. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001819. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342796
-
Does art expertise facilitate distancing?Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e370. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001789. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342797
-
Art as emotional exploration.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e372. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001807. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342798
-
Being moved is a positive emotion, and emotions should not be equated with their vernacular labels.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e374. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001820. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342799
-
Genre scripts and appreciation of negative emotion in the reception of film.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e376. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001844. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342800
-
Art reception as an interoceptive embodied predictive experience.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e350. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001856. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342802
-
Explaining the enjoyment of negative emotions evoked by the arts: The need to consider empathy and other underlying mechanisms of emotion induction.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e378. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1700187X. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342803
-
Tuning in to art: A predictive processing account of negative emotion in art.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e377. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001868. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342804
-
Embracing nonfiction: How to extend the Distancing-Embracing model.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e379. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001881. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342805
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
