Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Mar;19(3):205-214.
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

Bård I Røsok  1 , Thijs de Rooij  2 , Jony van Hilst  2 , Markus K Diener  3 , Peter J Allen  4 , Charles M Vollmer  5 , David A Kooby  6 , Shailesh V Shrikhande  7 ; Organizing Committee for the State of the Art Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection
Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article
Review

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

Bård I Røsok et al. HPB (Oxford). 2017 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Background: The first International conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection was arranged in conjunction with the annual meeting of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA), in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 19th 2016. The presented evidence and outcomes resulting from the session for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is summarized and addressed perioperative outcome, the outcome for cancer and patient selection for the procedure.

Methods: A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to compare MIDP and open distal pancreatectomy. Patient selection was discussed based on plenary talks, panel discussions and a worldwide survey on MIDP.

Results: Of 582 studies, 52 (40 observational and 12 case-matched) were included in the assessment for outcome for LDP (n = 5023) vs. ODP (n = 16,306) whereas 16 observational comparative studies were identified for cancer outcome. No randomized trials were identified. MIDP resulted in similar outcome to ODP with a tendency for lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay in the MIDP group.

Discussion: Available evidence for comparison of MIDP to ODP is weak, although the number of studies is high. Observed outcomes of MIDP are promising. In the absence of randomized control trials, an international registry should be established.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources