A prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: A single center experience
- PMID: 28216922
- PMCID: PMC5308030
- DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.198899
A prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: A single center experience
Abstract
Introduction: In our study, we reviewed efficacy and complication rates of open subinguinal varicocelectomy (OSV) and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy (LASV) using seminal and hormonal parameters in a prospective randomized study.
Materials and methods: We prospectively studied 60 males with Grade 2 and Grade 3 varicocele. Thirty patients underwent OSV and the other 30 patients underwent LASV. Intra-operative and post-operative complications along with pre-operative and post-operative seminal, hormonal parameters and testicular volume were compared between the groups.
Results: Sperm count, motility and morphology increased significantly in both groups, but the improvement was significantly better in LASV group. (Group A - improvement in sperm count, motility and morphology by 25%, 8.5%, 10.3%, respectively and in Group B - improvement in sperm count, motility and morphology by 110%, 68.59%, 71.1%, respectively. Decrease in serum follicular stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and increase in serum testosterone were significant in both groups, but the improvement was significantly better in LASV group. (Group A - serum FSH and LH decreased by 17.2%, 23%, respectively and serum testosterone increased by 13.7% and in Group B - serum FSH and LH decreased by 56.9%, 56.65%, respectively and serum testosterone increased by 95.9%). The recurrence (OSV = 13.2% and LASV = 0, P = 0.01) and complication rates were significantly lower in LASV group.
Conclusion: Our study shows that LASV is significantly better than OSV regarding efficacy and complication rates.
Keywords: Loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy; open subinguinal varicocelectomy; varicocele.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: None.
Figures
References
-
- Steeno O, Knops J, Declerck L, Adimoelja A, van de Voorde H. Prevention of fertility disorders by detection and treatment of varicocele at school and college age. Andrologia. 1976;8:47–53. - PubMed
-
- Kass EJ, Belman AB. Reversal of testicular growth failure by varicocele ligation. J Urol. 1987;137:475–6. - PubMed
-
- Paduch DA, Niedzielski J. Repair versus observation in adolescent varicocele: A prospective study. J Urol. 1997;158:1128–32. - PubMed
-
- Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:613–6. - PubMed
-
- Zampieri N, Zuin V, Corroppolo M, Ottolenghi A, Camoglio FS. Relationship between varicocele grade, vein reflux and testicular growth arrest. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24:727–30. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
