Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 6;8(1):81-89.
doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v8.i1.81.

Role of clinical pathway in improving the quality of care for patients with faecal incontinence: A randomised trial

Zeiad I Hussain  1 , Michael Lim  1 , Stevan Stojkovic  1
Affiliations

Role of clinical pathway in improving the quality of care for patients with faecal incontinence: A randomised trial

Zeiad I Hussain et al. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. .

Abstract

Aim: To assess the development and implementation of the Integrated Rapid Assessment and Treatment (IRAT) pathway for the management of patients with fecal incontinence and measure its impact on patients' care.

Methods: Patients referred to the colorectal unit in our hospital for the management of faecal incontinence were randomised to either the Standard Care pathway or the newly developed IRAT pathway in this feasibility study. The IRAT pathway is designed to provide a seamless multidisciplinary care to patients with faecal incontinence in a timely fashion. On the other hand, patients in the Standard Pathway were managed in the general colorectal clinic. Percentage improvements in St. Marks Incontinence Score, Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score and Rockwood Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale after completion of treatment in both groups were the primary outcome measures. Secondary endpoints were the time required to complete the management and patients' satisfaction score. χ2, Mann-Whitney-U and Kendall tau-c correlation coefficient tests were used for comparison of outcomes of the two study groups. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered significant.

Results: Thirty-nine patients, 34 females, consented to participate. Thirty-one (79.5%) patients completed the final assessment and were included in the outcome analysis. There was no significant difference in the quality of life scales and incontinence scores. Patients in the IRAT pathway were more satisfied with the time required to complete management (P = 0.033) and had stronger agreement that all aspects of their problem were covered (P = 0.006).

Conclusion: Despite of the lack of significant difference in outcome measures, the new pathway has positively influenced patient's mindset, which was reflected in a higher satisfaction score.

Keywords: Fecal incontinence; Pathway; Quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of progress through the phases of the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Nyatanga T, Holliman R. Integrated care pathways (ICPs) and infection control. Clinical Governance: An International Journal; 2005. pp. 106–117.
    1. Goldszer RC, Rutherford A, Banks P, Zou KH, Curley M, Rossi PB, Kahlert T, Goulart D, Santos K, Gustafson M. Implementing clinical pathways for patients admitted to a medical service: lessons learned. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2004;3:35–41. - PubMed
    1. Panella M, Marchisio S, Di Stanislao F. Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways: do pathways work? Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:509–521. - PubMed
    1. Hill M. The development of care management systems to achieve clinical integration. Adv Pract Nurs Q. 1998;4:33–39. - PubMed
    1. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources