Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb 7:2:8.
doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.01.08. eCollection 2017.

Preoperative staging of nodal status in gastric cancer

Affiliations
Review

Preoperative staging of nodal status in gastric cancer

Felix Berlth et al. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. .

Abstract

An accurate preoperative staging of nodal status is crucial in gastric cancer, because it has a great impact on prognosis and therapeutic decision-making. Different staging methods have been evaluated for gastric cancer in order to predict nodal involvement. So far, no technique could meet the necessary requirements, which include a high detection rate of infiltrated lymph nodes and a low frequency of false-positive results. This article summarizes different staging methods used to assess lymph node status in patients with gastric cancer, evaluates the evidence, and proposes to establish new methods.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; nodal status; preoperative staging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Detection of gastric cancer in the greater curvature with suspicious lymph nodes present at the lesser curvature by computed tomography (CT).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gastric cancer and lymph node detection by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Detection of gastric cancer with regional lymph node involvement and liver metastasis by fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography computed tomography (FDG-PET CT).

References

    1. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 2007;18:581-92. 10.1093/annonc/mdl498 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108. 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marrelli D, De Stefano A, de Manzoni G, et al. Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 2005;241:247-55. 10.1097/01.sla.0000152019.14741.97 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim JP, Lee JH, Kim SJ, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10 783 patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:125-33. 10.1007/s101200050006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jung H, Lee HH, Song KY, et al. Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer. Cancer 2011;117:2371-8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources