Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Apr;53(2):879-895.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12664. Epub 2017 Feb 19.

Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial

Sinja Alexandra Ernst et al. Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether a combination of Internet-based and postal survey methods (mixed-mode) compared to postal-only survey methods (postal-only) leads to improved response rates in a physician survey, and to compare the cost implications of the different recruitment strategies.

Data sources/study setting: All primary care gynecologists in Bremen and Lower Saxony, Germany, were invited to participate in a cross-sectional survey from January to July 2014.

Study design: The sample was divided into two strata (A; B) depending on availability of an email address. Within each stratum, potential participants were randomly assigned to mixed-mode or postal-only group.

Principal findings: In Stratum A, the mixed-mode group had a lower response rate compared to the postal-only group (12.5 vs. 20.2 percent; RR = 0.61, 95 percent CI: 0.44-0.87). In stratum B, no significant differences were found (15.6 vs. 16.2 percent; RR = 0.95, 95 percent CI: 0.62-1.44). Total costs (in €) per valid questionnaire returned (Stratum A: 399.72 vs. 248.85; Stratum B: 496.37 vs. 455.15) and per percentage point of response (Stratum A: 1,379.02 vs. 861.02; Stratum B 1,116.82 vs. 1,024.09) were higher, whereas variable costs were lower in mixed-mode compared to the respective postal-only groups (Stratum A cost ratio: 0.47, Stratum B cost ratio: 0.71).

Conclusions: In this study, primary care gynecologists were more likely to participate by traditional postal-only than by mixed-mode survey methods that first offered an Internet option. However, the lower response rate for the mixed-mode method may be partly due to the older age structure of the responding gynecologists. Variable costs per returned questionnaire were substantially lower in mixed-mode groups and indicate the potential for cost savings if the sample population is sufficiently large.

Keywords: Physician survey; cost implications; methods; mixed-mode; response rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Allocation to Study Arms and Recruitment Strategies

References

    1. Akl, E. A. , Maroun N., Klocke R. A., Montori V., and Schunemann H. J.. 2005. “Electronic Mail Was Not Better Than Postal Mail for Surveying Residents and Faculty.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 58 (4): 425–9. - PubMed
    1. Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians Bremen . 2015. [accessed on January 30, 2016]. Available at http://www.kvhb.de/
    1. Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians Lower Saxony . 2015. [accessed on January 30, 2016]. Available at http://www.kvn.de/Startseite/
    1. Bais, J. M. , Eskes M., Pel M., Bonsel G. J., and Bleker O. P.. 2004. “Effectiveness of Detection of Intrauterine Growth Retardation by Abdominal Palpation as Screening Test in a Low Risk Population: An Observational Study.” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 116 (2): 164–9. - PubMed
    1. Beebe, T. J. , Locke G. R., Barnes S. A., Davern M. E., and Anderson K. J.. 2007. “Mixing Web and Mail Methods in a Survey of Physicians.” Health Services Research 42 (3): 1219–34. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources