Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;92(3):290-297.
doi: 10.1111/cge.12998. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

Defining personal utility in genomics: A Delphi study

Affiliations

Defining personal utility in genomics: A Delphi study

J N Kohler et al. Clin Genet. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Individual genome sequencing results are valued by patients in ways distinct from clinical utility. Such outcomes have been described as components of "personal utility," a concept that broadly encompasses patient-endorsed benefits, that is operationally defined as non-clinical outcomes. No empirical delineation of these outcomes has been reported.

Aim: To address this gap, we administered a Delphi survey to adult participants in a National Institute of Health (NIH) clinical exome study to extract the most highly endorsed outcomes constituting personal utility.

Materials and methods: Forty research participants responded to a Delphi survey to rate 35 items identified by a systematic literature review of personal utility.

Results: Two rounds of ranking resulted in 24 items that represented 14 distinct elements of personal utility. Elements most highly endorsed by participants were: increased self-knowledge, knowledge of "the condition," altruism, and anticipated coping.

Discussion: Our findings represent the first systematic effort to delineate elements of personal utility that may be used to anticipate participant expectation and inform genetic counseling prior to sequencing. The 24 items reported need to be studied further in additional clinical genome sequencing studies to assess generalizability in other populations. Further research will help to understand motivations and to predict the meaning and use of results.

Keywords: Delphi; genetic testing; genomics; personal outcomes; personal utility; utility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Sample survey item from survey 1 (A) and survey 2 (B).

References

    1. Biesecker LG, Green RC. Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2418–2425. - PubMed
    1. Foster MW, Mulvihill JJ, Sharp RR. Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information. Genet Med. 2009;11:570–574. - PubMed
    1. Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS. Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am J Bioeth. 2006;6:8–17. - PubMed
    1. Facio F, Eidem H, Fisher T, et al. Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:261–265. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lupo PJ, Robinson JO, Diamond PM, et al. Patients’ perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing for their healthcare: findings from the MedSeq project. Per Med. 2016;13:13–20. - PMC - PubMed