Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb 17;17(2):390.
doi: 10.3390/s17020390.

Capacitive Biosensors and Molecularly Imprinted Electrodes

Affiliations
Review

Capacitive Biosensors and Molecularly Imprinted Electrodes

Gizem Ertürk et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Capacitive biosensors belong to the group of affinity biosensors that operate by registering direct binding between the sensor surface and the target molecule. This type of biosensors measures the changes in dielectric properties and/or thickness of the dielectric layer at the electrolyte/electrode interface. Capacitive biosensors have so far been successfully used for detection of proteins, nucleotides, heavy metals, saccharides, small organic molecules and microbial cells. In recent years, the microcontact imprinting method has been used to create very sensitive and selective biorecognition cavities on surfaces of capacitive electrodes. This chapter summarizes the principle and different applications of capacitive biosensors with an emphasis on microcontact imprinting method with its recent capacitive biosensor applications.

Keywords: affinity biosensors; capacitive biosensors; microcontact imprinting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Schematic diagram showing the change in capacitance (ΔC) as a function of time when the analyte (IgG) interacts with the receptor molecule (Protein A) immobilized on the surface of the electrode. Subsequent rise in signal is due to the dissociation after the injection of the regeneration solution. In an ideal sensorgram, the baseline should turn back to the original level after regeneration of the surface; (B) Immobilization of the receptor molecule on the transducer surface via a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of alkylthiols. When the target molecule interacts with the receptor, this creates a double layer of counter ions around the gold transducer which results in a change in the capacitance. (Reproduced from Reference [8] with permission).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of the competitive glucose binding assay. (a) When glucose is injected into the capacitive system, it binds to the immobilized Concanavalin A (ConA) on the surface. However, this binding does not make any change in the capacitance level, as shown in the graph on the right, due to the small size of the glucose molecule; (b) When a glucose polymer (dextran) is injected into the system, binding of this big polymer to ConA results in a decrease in the capacitance signal; (c) When glucose is injected into the system again, displacement of dextran with glucose results in the capacitance turn back to the original baseline level. (Reproduced from Reference [22] with permission).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) pictures of the electrode surface after functionalization with imprinted polymers. From left to right, top to bottom: (a) SEM picture of electrode surface; (b,c) SEM pictures of centre of the electrode; and (d) SEM picture of the border between the gold layer and wafer. (Reproduced from Reference [23] with permission).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic representation of bio-imprinting process. (Reproduced from Reference [24] with permission).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Different applications of MIPs in: (A) immunosensors; (B) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); (C) enzyme electrodes, reaction rate and analyte concentration of enzyme electrodes and catalytic MIP-coated electrodes can be estimated by electroactive substrate/product consumption/production during the catalytic reaction or electron transfer from the electrode surface to the active centre of enzyme/MIP; (D) DNA chips; and (E) enzyme immobilization and competitive binding of the analyte. (Reproduced from Reference [52] with permission).
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Schematic representation of the capacitive system with current pulse method. The system is comprised of: (1) current source; (2) flow cell which is connected to the working, reference and auxiliary electrodes; (3) potential differential amplifier; and (4) a processor and ADC where the analogue potential is converted to digital signal; (b) A schematic view of Howland current pump used for supplying constant current; (c) Constant current supply to the sensor during the determined time periods to measure the resistance and capacitance; (d) Capacitance is measured every minute and each minute (pulse) contains five sub pulse measurements with 20 ms intervals. (Reproduced from reference [57] with permission).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Schematic representation of automated flow injection capacitive system. The components shown in the figure are integrated into a box to make a single, portable unit. (Reproduced from Reference [63] with permission).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Schematic representation of preparation of trypsin imprinted capacitive electrodes using microcontact imprinting procedure: (A) preparation of glass cover slips (protein stamps); (B) preparation of capacitive gold electrodes; and (C) imprinting of trypsin to the electrode surface via microcontact imprinting method. (Reproduced from Reference [60] with permission).

References

    1. Berggren C., Bjarnason B., Johansson G. Capacitive biosensors. Electroanalysis. 2001;13:173–180. doi: 10.1002/1521-4109(200103)13:3<173::AID-ELAN173>3.0.CO;2-B. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waggoner P.S., Craighead H.G. Micro- and nanomechanical sensors for environmental, chemical, and biological detection. Lab Chip. 2007;7:1238–1255. doi: 10.1039/b707401h. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daniels J.S., Pourmand N. Label-free impedance biosensors: Opportunities and challenges. Electroanalysis. 2007;19:1239–1257. doi: 10.1002/elan.200603855. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsouti V., Boutopoulos C., Zergioti I., Chatzandroulis S. Capacitive microsystems for biological sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011;27:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.05.047. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mattiasson B., Teeparuksapun K., Hedström M. Immunochemical binding assays for detection and quantification of trace impurities in biotechnological production. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.10.002. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources