Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;52(6):825-831.
doi: 10.1038/bmt.2017.3. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for refractory acute myeloid leukemia in pediatric patients: the UK experience

Affiliations

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for refractory acute myeloid leukemia in pediatric patients: the UK experience

P O'Hare et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

We report outcomes for 44 children who underwent stem cell transplantation (SCT) for refractory AML in the UK between 2000 and 2012. Median age at SCT was 11.5 years. Twenty-three patients had primary refractory and 21 relapsed refractory AML. Refractory disease was confirmed by cytogenetics/molecular genetics in 24 cases. Median follow-up of the whole cohort is 6.8 years (2.1-14.9 years). Thirty patients (68%) achieved a CR following SCT. Transplant-related mortality at 1 year was 18%. Acute GVHD incidence was 52% (grade ⩾III 19%), chronic 7%. Relapse was the major cause of treatment failure and occurred in 32% of patients at a median of 61 days post SCT. Five-year overall survival and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 43% (95% CI 31-61%). All patients with favorable cytogenetics (n=6) are alive in CR. Outcomes in patients with primary refractory disease were equivalent to those with relapsed refractory AML. Blast percentage ⩽30% in the BM pre-SCT, myeloablative conditioning and acute GVHD proved to be favorable prognostic features. We could stratify patients according to age ⩾10 years and >30% blasts in BM pre-SCT. Patients with none/one of these risk factors were highly salvageable (5 years LFS 53%) whereas those with both factors had a very poor prognosis (5 years LFS 10%). This may facilitate decision making on whether it is appropriate to consider transplant in such patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Haematol. 2015 Dec;95(6):498-506 - PubMed
    1. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Mar;15(3):367-9 - PubMed
    1. Blood. 2015 Jul 16;126(3):319-27 - PubMed
    1. Leukemia. 2011 May;25(5):808-13 - PubMed
    1. Br J Haematol. 2015 Nov;171(4):566-73 - PubMed

MeSH terms