Women's willingness and ability to feel the strings of their intrauterine device
- PMID: 28218963
- PMCID: PMC5584634
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12130
Women's willingness and ability to feel the strings of their intrauterine device
Abstract
Objective: To determine how many intrauterine device (IUD) users are willing and able to palpate their IUD strings.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among IUD users presenting for their 6-week follow-up visit after insertion at the University of Hawaii, USA, between January 2011 and January 2012. Participants were asked whether they had previously felt the strings and whether they were willing to do so during the visit. Bivariate analyses and multiple logistic regression were performed.
Results: Previous attempts to palpate IUD strings were reported by 74 (58.7%) of 126 participants, of whom 49 (66.2%) could feel the strings. At the study visit, 60 (47.6%) participants were willing to try to feel their strings; 33 (55.0%) were successful. Overall, 58 (46.0%) participants were willing and able to palpate their IUD strings at home and/or at the study visit. Fewer women who self-identified as native Hawaiian than women of other races reported previous attempts (P=0.005). Previous instruction to check IUD strings was associated with willingness to palpate them before and after controlling for native Hawaiian race (odds ratio 8.78, 95% CI 3.43-22.43; adjusted odds ratio 9.64, 95% CI 3.57-26.04).
Conclusion: Approximately half the participants were willing and able to palpate their IUD strings. Routinely counseling women to check their IUD strings could have limited clinical utility.
Keywords: Contraceptive management; Follow-up; IUD strings; Intrauterine device; Long-acting reversible contraception.
© 2017 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Conflict of interest statement
BK was a consultant for Bayer in 2011. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Characteristics of users of intrauterine devices and other reversible contraceptive methods in the United States.Fertil Steril. 2011 Nov;96(5):1138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.019. Epub 2011 Sep 13. Fertil Steril. 2011. PMID: 21917255
-
[Posplacenta intrauterine device. Guide wires not visible].Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2012 Mar;80(3):201-7. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2012. PMID: 22812176 Spanish.
-
Use of the intrauterine device among adolescent and young adult women in the United States from 2002 to 2010.J Adolesc Health. 2013 Sep;53(3):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12. J Adolesc Health. 2013. PMID: 23763968
-
Management of missing intrauterine device strings and migrated intrauterine devices.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec 1;35(6):496-500. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000911. Epub 2023 Aug 21. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37610992 Review.
-
Women's knowledge about Intrauterine Device and user satisfaction in Brazil: a systematic review.Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025 May 26;59:e20240262. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0262en. eCollection 2025. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025. PMID: 40434109 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Intrauterine device migration into the lumen of large bowel: A case report.Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;72:306-308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jun 12. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020. PMID: 32563091 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic nodules of sigmoid perforation caused by incarcerated intrauterine contraception device.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(4):e14117. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014117. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 30681572 Free PMC article.
-
Case Report: Strangulated intestinal obstruction due to chronic migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): a 30-year latent complication.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 7;12:1613116. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1613116. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40692957 Free PMC article.
-
IUD self-removal as self-care: Research is needed in low and middle-income countries.Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Sep 7;3:992639. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.992639. eCollection 2022. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36159884 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Management of an Intrauterine Device Migration Resulting in a Pregnancy - Clinical Case.Maedica (Bucur). 2020 Dec;15(4):549-551. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.4.549. Maedica (Bucur). 2020. PMID: 33603916 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Clifton D, Kaneda T. Family Planning Worldwide 2013 Data Sheet. 2013 http://www.prb.org/pdf13/family-planning-2013-datasheet_eng.pdf. Accessed January 9, 2017.
-
- Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J, Mosher W. Current Contraceptive Use and Variation by Selected Characteristics Among Women Aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. (National health statistics reports, no 86). - PubMed
-
- Committee opinion no. 539: Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:983–988. - PubMed
-
- Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015;91:274–279. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources