Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Mar;49(2):303-308.
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.12.010.

Estimation of Right-Lobe Graft Weight From Computed Tomographic Volumetry for Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Estimation of Right-Lobe Graft Weight From Computed Tomographic Volumetry for Living Donor Liver Transplantation

X Yang et al. Transplant Proc. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The objective of the study was to establish a right-lobe graft weight (GW) estimation formula for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from right-lobe graft volume without veins (GVw/o_veins), including portal vein and hepatic vein measured by computed tomographic (CT) volumetry, and to compare its estimation accuracy with those of existing formulas. Right-lobe GW estimation formulas established with the use of graft volume with veins (GVw_veins) sacrifice accuracy because GW measured intra-operatively excludes the weight of blood in the veins. Right-lobe GW estimation formulas have been established with the use of right-lobe GVw/o_veins, but a more accurate formula must be developed.

Methods: The present study developed right-lobe GW estimation formulas based on GVw/o_veins as well as GVw_veins, using 40 cases of Korean donors: GW = 29.1 + 0.943 × GVw/o_veins (adjusted R2 = 0.94) and GW = 74.7 + 0.773 × GVw_veins (adjusted R2 = 0.87). The proposed GW estimation formulas were compared with existing GVw_veins- and GVw/o_veins-based models, using 43 cases additionally obtained from two medical centers for cross-validation.

Results: The GVw/o_veins-based formula developed in the present study was most preferred (absolute error = 21.5 ± 16.5 g and percentage of absolute error = 3.0 ± 2.3%).

Conclusions: The GVw/o_veins-based formula is preferred to the GVw_veins-based formula in GW estimation. Accurate CT volumetry and alignment between planned and actual surgical cutting lines are crucial in the establishment of a better GW estimation formula.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources