Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 1):75-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

Basing assessment and treatment of problem behavior on behavioral momentum theory: Analyses of behavioral persistence

Affiliations
Review

Basing assessment and treatment of problem behavior on behavioral momentum theory: Analyses of behavioral persistence

Kelly M Schieltz et al. Behav Processes. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

The connection, or bridge, between applied and basic behavior analysis has been long-established (Hake, 1982; Mace & Critchfield, 2010). In this article, we describe how clinical decisions can be based more directly on behavioral processes and how basing clinical procedures on behavioral processes can lead to improved clinical outcomes. As a case in point, we describe how applied behavior analyses of maintenance, and specifically the long-term maintenance of treatment effects related to problem behavior, can be adjusted and potentially enhanced by basing treatment on Behavioral Momentum Theory. We provide a brief review of the literature including descriptions of two translational studies that proposed changes in how differential reinforcement of alternative behavior treatments are conducted based on Behavioral Momentum Theory. We then describe current clinical examples of how these translations are continuing to impact the definitions, designs, analyses, and treatment procedures used in our clinical practice.

Keywords: Behavioral momentum theory; Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior; Long-term maintenance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Responses per minute of problem behavior for Lawrence. BL = baseline; FCT = functional communication training; EXT = extinction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of tasks attempted (top panel) and percentage of intervals of problem behavior (bottom panel) for Sam. BL = baseline; Sr+ = positive reinforcement; Cont. Sr+ = contingent positive reinforcement; Dashed lines = mean percentage of tasks attempted
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of sessions to reach a stable 90% reduction during FCT and EXT for 5 participants in the Wacker et al. (2011) study. FCT = functional communication training; EXT = extinction

References

    1. Ahearn WH, Clark KM, Gardenier NC, Chung BI, Dube WV. Persistence of stereotypic behavior: Examining the effects of external reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2003;36:439–448. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-439. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asmus JM, Ringdahl JE, Sellers JA, Call NA, Andelman MS, Wacker DP. Use of a short-term inpatient model to evaluate aberrant behavior: Outcome data summaries from 1996 to 2001. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2004;37:283–304. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-283. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg W, Ringdahl J, Ryan S, Ing A, Lustig N, Romani P, Andersen J. Resurgence of mands following functional communication training. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis. 2015;41:166–186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg WK, Wacker DP, Harding JW, Ganzer J, Barretto A. An evaluation of multiple dependent variables across distinct classes of antecedent stimuli pre and post functional communication training. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention. 2007;3:305–333. doi: 10.1037/h0100346. - DOI
    1. Bland VJ, Bai JYH, Fullerton JA, Podlesnik CA. Signaled alternative reinforcement and the persistence of operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 2016;106:22–33. doi: 10.1002/jeab.212. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources