Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Feb 20;6(2):e005070.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005070.

Impact of Coronary Artery Disease Severity Assessed With the SYNTAX Score on Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of Coronary Artery Disease Severity Assessed With the SYNTAX Score on Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Jean-Michel Paradis et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: The influence of coronary artery disease (CAD) on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is still controversial. We sought to evaluate the impact of CAD severity as measured by the SYNTAX score (SS) on patients undergoing TAVR.

Methods and results: A total of 377 patients who underwent TAVR in 2 high-volume centers in North America were included in our retrospective analysis. A blinded angiographic core laboratory calculated the SS on all available coronary angiograms with the use of quantitative coronary analysis. Patients were stratified into 4 groups: (1) no CAD (SS=0); (2) low SS (SS between 1 and 22); (3) intermediate SS (SS between 23 and 32); and (4) high SS (SS ≥33). Patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 months prior to TAVR were separated into 2 categories based on their residual SS (<8 and ≥8). Patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were divided into 2 groups: (1) low CABG SS and (2) high CABG SS. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke. At 30 days and 1 year, both the presence and the severity of CAD had no impact on the rate of the combined primary end point and on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and myocardial infarction. Patients with less complete revascularization (residual SS ≥8 versus residual SS <8 and low CABG SS versus high CABG SS, had similar rates of the combined primary end point, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MI, and stroke, at both 30 days and 1 year.

Conclusions: In our core laboratory-validated study, neither the severity of CAD nor completeness of revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention or CABG were associated with clinical outcomes after TAVR, at both 30 days and 1 year.

Keywords: SYNTAX score; aortic stenosis; coronary artery disease; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier curves at 1 year according to the SYNTAX score for (A) the combined end point (all cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke); (B) all‐cause mortality; (C) cardiovascular mortality; and (D) Kaplan–Meier curves for the combined end point when comparing only 2 groups: no coronary artery disease (CAD) or CAD (regardless of the SYNTAX score). HR indicates hazard ratio.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between the SYNTAX score at baseline and the residual SYNTAX score.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier curves at 1 year according to the residual SYNTAX score for (A) the combined end point (all‐cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke); (B) all‐cause mortality; and (C) cardiovascular mortality. CAD indicates coronary artery disease.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier curves at 1 year according to coronary artery bypass surgery SYNTAX score for (A) the combined end point (all‐cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke); (B) all‐cause mortality; and (C) cardiovascular mortality. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass graft surgery; CAD, coronary artery disease.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rapp AH, Hillis LD, Lange RA, Cigarroa JE. Prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with aortic stenosis with and without angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:1216–1217; A7. - PubMed
    1. Vandeplas A, Willems JL, Piessens J, De Geest H. Frequency of angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in severe isolated valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:117–120. - PubMed
    1. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Guyton RA, O'Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM, Thomas JD; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines . 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:e57–e185. - PubMed
    1. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, Gardin JM, Gottdiener JS, Smith VE, Kitzman DW, Otto CM. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:630–634. - PubMed
    1. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Improving assessment of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:169–180. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources