Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone
- PMID: 28220189
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2014-8
Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone
Abstract
Purpose: To develop practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with a solitary stone in the proximal ureter.
Methods: Between July 2006 and June 2015, 319 patients with a proximal ureteral stone who underwent preoperative non-contrast enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) and subsequently received SWL were identified. Patients' age, gender, laterality, stone size, mean and maximum Hounsfield Unit (HU) of the stone, and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) were assessed. The stone-free status was defined as no radiopacity detected on the 3-month follow-up plain radiography or NCCT.
Results: Mean stone size was 10 mm (range 3-20 mm). Mean and maximum HU of the stone ranged from 115 to 1447 (mean 701) and from 265 to 1881 (mean 1062), respectively. The overall stone-free rate was 70%. Multivariate analyses identified stone size (p < 0.001), maximum HU (p < 0.001), and SSD at 90° (p = 0.038) as independent predictive factors for the stone-free status after SWL. Nomograms could be constructed for predicting the probability of stone-free status after SWL corresponding to SSD of 8, 10, and 12 cm using maximum HU and stone size.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that stone size, maximum HU of the stone, and SSD at 90° are significant predictors of successful SWL outcome in patients with a proximal ureteral stone. We have developed simple and practical nomograms corresponding to three different SSDs for predicting the stone-free rate after SWL.
Keywords: Hounsfield unit; Lithotripsy; Nomograms; Shock wave lithotripsy; Skin-to-stone distance; Urinary calculi.
Similar articles
-
How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?BMC Urol. 2015 Jul 23;15:72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0069-7. BMC Urol. 2015. PMID: 26201514 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5. J Pediatr Urol. 2015. PMID: 25812469
-
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3. J Endourol. 2016. PMID: 27597174
-
Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Apr;24(4):173-185. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01145-w. Epub 2023 Feb 21. Curr Urol Rep. 2023. PMID: 36802317 Free PMC article.
-
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: retrospective study on possible predictors of treatment success and revisiting the role of non-contrast-enhanced computer tomography in kidney and ureteral stone disease.Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 17;52(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01570-7. Urolithiasis. 2024. PMID: 38630281 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Can intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions affect success in the treatment of upper ureteral stones?Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Dec;13(4):507-511. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.75873. Epub 2018 May 21. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018. PMID: 30524622 Free PMC article.
-
The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU.Urolithiasis. 2020 Feb;48(1):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01123-3. Epub 2019 Mar 11. Urolithiasis. 2020. PMID: 30859262
-
Advancing decision-making in shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones: the role of radiological stone impaction markers.Urolithiasis. 2025 Jul 17;53(1):139. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01797-y. Urolithiasis. 2025. PMID: 40676249 Free PMC article.
-
Which frequency is better for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy? Low intermediate or high: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Surg. 2023 Mar 15;10:1063159. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1063159. eCollection 2023. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 37009606 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comparative Study of Stone Re-Treatment after Lithotripsy.Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;12(12):2130. doi: 10.3390/life12122130. Life (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36556495 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources