Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;30(2):277-283.
doi: 10.1007/s10534-017-0004-3. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

Increased mercury emissions from modern dental amalgams

Affiliations

Increased mercury emissions from modern dental amalgams

Ulf G Bengtsson et al. Biometals. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

All types of dental amalgams contain mercury, which partly is emitted as mercury vapor. All types of dental amalgams corrode after being placed in the oral cavity. Modern high copper amalgams exhibit two new traits of increased instability. Firstly, when subjected to wear/polishing, droplets rich in mercury are formed on the surface, showing that mercury is not being strongly bonded to the base or alloy metals. Secondly, high copper amalgams emit substantially larger amounts of mercury vapor than the low copper amalgams used before the 1970s. High copper amalgams has been developed with focus on mechanical strength and corrosion resistance, but has been sub-optimized in other aspects, resulting in increased instability and higher emission of mercury vapor. This has not been presented to policy makers and scientists. Both low and high copper amalgams undergo a transformation process for several years after placement, resulting in a substantial reduction in mercury content, but there exist no limit for maximum allowed emission of mercury from dental amalgams. These modern high copper amalgams are nowadays totally dominating the European, US and other markets, resulting in significant emissions of mercury, not considered when judging their suitability for dental restoration.

Keywords: Copper amalgam; Mercury; Non-gamma-two; Non-ɣ2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicting interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Two tablets of copper amalgam in a spoon heated over an open flame ready to be crushed. With courtesy of the Norwegian TV Company NRK
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Droplets of mercury on the surface of modern, high copper non-ɣ2-amalgam, photographed with a light microscope (×252 magnifying). Photo: Ulf Bengtsson
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A sphere of mercury on the surface of modern, high copper non-ɣ2-amalgam, documented with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Note the strong signal from mercury as the electron beam passes the sphere. Photo: Ulf Bengtsson
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mercury vapour loss (ng) between 0.5 and 30 min after abrasion. Left group (red cross-hatched bars): non-ɣ2-amalgams; third bar from right (blue hatched): reduced ɣ2-amalgam; right group (two white bars): old, conventional ɣ2–containing amalgams Diagram based on findings in Mahler et al. (1994). (Color figure online)

References

    1. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR (2012) Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials, 12th edn. Elsevier, St. Louis
    1. Bergdahl G. Residual mercury and amalgam quantity in conventional and wet techniques. Eur J Oral Sci. 1973;81:260–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1973.tb00590.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyer DB. Mercury vaporization from corroded dental amalgam. Dent Mater. 1988;4:89–93. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80097-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferracane JL. Mercury vaporization from amalgams with varied alloy compositions. J Dent Res. 1995;74(7):1414–1417. doi: 10.1177/00220345950740071401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fredin B. Mercury release from dental amalgam fillings. Int J Risk Saf Med. 1994;4(3):197–208. - PubMed

Publication types