Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;19(4):e2948.
doi: 10.1002/jgm.2948.

Clinical and molecular cytogenetic analyses of four families with 1q21.1 microdeletion or microduplication

Affiliations

Clinical and molecular cytogenetic analyses of four families with 1q21.1 microdeletion or microduplication

Hong-Dan Wang et al. J Gene Med. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Little information is available regarding the penetrance of 1q21.1 copy number variants (CNVs). In the present study, we explored the clinical significance of 1q21.1 microdeletion or microduplication.

Methods: In four families, chromosome karyotype was analyzed using G-banding karyotype analysis technology. CNVs were detected using array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and then a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to validate candidate CNVs. Sequence signature in the breakpoint region was analyzed using University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) databases.

Results: Except for karyotype 45, XX, der (13, 14) (q10, q10) in the mother (I2) of family 2, the karyotype was normal in all other members of the four families. In the mother (I2) and fetus (II2) of family 1, in newborn (II1) of family 2 and in fetus (II1) of family 3, there was 1.22-Mb heterozygous microdeletion in the chromosome 1q21.1q21.2 region. The child (II1) of family 4 had a 1.46-Mb heterozygous microduplication in the chromosome 1q21.1q21.2 region. The results of the qPCR were consistent with that of aCGH. There was large number of low copy repeats (LCRs) in the breakpoint region found by analysis of the UCSC database, and multiple LCRs were matched with sequences in the chromosome 1 short-arm region.

Conclusions: 1q21.1 microdeletion and microduplication exhibit a variety of clinical manifestations and the specificity of their clinical features is not high. The penetrance of the distal 1q21.1 microdeletion may be affected by other factors in the present study. In summary, we report the discovery of a new distal 1q21.1 microduplication, which enriches the CNV spectrum in the 1q21.1 region and is conducive to prenatal genetic counseling.

Keywords: 1q21.1 microdeletion; 1q21.1 microduplication; array-comparative genomic hybridization; copy number variations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Genealogical tree for the four families in this study. I, parent; II, offspring; □, male; ○, female; ⋄, fetus; black, CNV patient with clinical symptoms; oblique line, CNV patient without clinical symptoms
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fetal encephalomeningocele. Behind the fetal head, there is a 56 × 52 mm fluid sonolucent area that is multilocular as a result of the existence of septations with a 15 × 9 mm high‐level echo
Figure 3
Figure 3
The fetus has complete atrioventricular septal defect. The four‐chamber view of the fetus shows the disappearance of cross section with a 6.75‐mm defect
Figure 4
Figure 4
Tetralogy of Fallot combined with acleistocardia. Left ventricular long‐axis view shows the ventricular septal defect and aortic over‐riding (left). Large arterial short‐axis view shows the main pulmonary artery, left pulmonary artery, right pulmonary artery stenosis and the increased thickness of the right ventricular anterior wall (right)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Results of array comparative genomic hybridization in family 1. As indicated by the arrows, there was the same 1.22‐Mb heterozygous microdeletion with the molecular karyotype of arr[hg19] 1q21.1q21.2(146,564,743–147,786,706) × 1, respectively, in the mother (I2) and fetus (II2)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Results of array comparative genomic hybridization in family 2. As indicated by the arrow, there was a de novo 1.22‐Mb heterozygous microdeletion with the molecular karyotype of arr[hg19] 1q21.1q21.2(146,564,743–147,786,706) × 1 in the newborn (II1)
Figure 7
Figure 7
Results of array comparative genomic hybridization in family 3. As indicated by the arrow, there was a de novo 1.22‐Mb heterozygous microdeletion with the molecular karyotype of arr[hg19] 1q21.1q21.2(146,564,743–147,786,706) × 1 in the fetus (II1)
Figure 8
Figure 8
Results of array comparative genomic hybridization in family 4. As indicated by the arrow, there was a de novo 1.46‐Mb heterozygous microduplication with the molecular karyotype of arr[hg19] 1q21.1q21.2: (146,324,068–147,786,706) × 3 in the child (II1)
Figure 9
Figure 9
The UCSC database indicates a large number of repeated similar fragments in the 1q21.1q21.2 region with CNVs

References

    1. Verhagen JM, de Leeuw N, Papatsonis DN, Grijseels EW, de Krijger RR, Wessels MW. Phenotypic variability associated with a large recurrent 1q21.1 microduplication in a three‐generation family. Mol Syndromol. 2015;6:71‐76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dolcetti A, Silversides CK, Marshall CR, et al. 1q21.1 microduplication expression in adults. Genet Med. 2013;15:282‐289. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernier R, Steinman KJ, Reilly B, et al. Clinical phenotype of the recurrent 1q21.1 copy‐number variant. Genet Med. 2016;18:341‐349. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brunetti‐Pierri N, Berg JS, Scaglia F, et al. Recurrent reciprocal 1q21.1 deletions and duplications associated with microcephaly or macrocephaly and developmental and behavioral abnormalities. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1466‐1471. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mefford HC, Sharp AJ, Baker C, et al. Recurrent rearrangements of chromosome 1q21.1 and variable pediatric phenotypes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1685‐1699. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts