Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):72.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1251-6.

Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study

Affiliations

Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study

Marija Simic et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: We sought to investigate the impact of the duration of second stage of labor on risk of severe perineal lacerations (third and fourth degree).

Methods: This population based cohort study was conducted in the Stockholm/Gotland region, Sweden, 2008-2014. Study population included 52 211 primiparous women undergoing vaginal delivery with cephalic presentation at term. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR), using 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main exposure was duration of second stage of labor, and main outcome was risks of severe perineal lacerations (third and fourth degree).

Results: Risk of severe perineal lacerations increased with duration of second stage of labor. Compared with a second stage of labor of 1 h or less, women with a second stage of more than 2 h had an increased risk (aOR 1.42; 95% CI 1.28-1.58). Compared with non-instrumental vaginal deliveries, the risk was elevated among instrumental vaginal deliveries (aOR 2.24; 95% CI 2.07-2.42). The risk of perineal laceration increased with duration of second stage of labor until less than 3 h in both instrumental and non-instrumental vaginal deliveries, but after 3 h, the ORs did not further increase. After adjustments for potential confounders, macrosomia (birth weight > 4 500 g) and occiput posterior fetal position were risk factors of severe perineal lacerations.

Conclusions: The risk of severe perineal laceration increases with duration until the third hour of second stage of labor. Instrumental delivery is the most significant risk factor for severe lacerations, followed by duration of second stage of labor, fetal size and occiput posterior fetal position.

Keywords: Episiotomy; Instrumental delivery; Macrosomia; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Occiput posterior position; Partograph; Perineal lacerations; Pregnancy; Second stage of labor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van Delft K, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Schwertner-Tiepelmann N, Kluivers K. The relationship between postpartum levator ani muscle avulsion and signs and symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction. BJOG. 2014;121(9):1164–71. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12666. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M. Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ. 2002;166(3):326–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JO. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6):1543–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blomberg M. Maternal body mass index and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:395803. doi: 10.1155/2014/395803. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Altman MR, Lydon-Rochelle MT. Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Birth. 2006;33(4):315–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00129.x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms