Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;94(3):370-379.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001053.

Spherical Soft Contact Lens Designs and Peripheral Defocus in Myopic Eyes

Affiliations

Spherical Soft Contact Lens Designs and Peripheral Defocus in Myopic Eyes

Kelly E Moore et al. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Peripheral retinal defocus has been implicated in myopia progression. The effect of commercially available spherical soft contact lenses (SCLs) on peripheral defocus of adult myopic eyes was investigated.

Methods: Twenty-five young adults with spherical equivalent (SE) refractions between -0.50D and -6.00D were enrolled. Cycloplegic autorefraction (right eye) was measured centrally and ±20°, ±30°, and ±40° from the line of sight along the horizontal meridian using an autorefractor. Four commercially available spherical SCLs (Biofinity, Acuvue2, PureVision2, and Air Optix Night & Day Aqua) were evaluated. SE defocus (M) was used to calculate relative peripheral defocus (RPD) while wearing each SCL and relative peripheral refraction of the uncorrected eye. Spherical aberration (SA) changes caused by each SCL were measured along the line of sight by aberrometry. Peripheral defocus was analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance (RM-ANOVA). The association between changes in axial SA and the change in peripheral defocus was evaluated using linear mixed models.

Results: The mean age (±SD) and central SE refractive error were 24.0 ± 1.3 years and -3.45 ± 1.42D, respectively. PureVision2 did not change RPD (P = .33). Significant myopic shifts on the temporal retina were found with three lenses: Acuvue 2 (-0.29D at 30°; -0.80D at 40°; both P ≤ .01), Biofinity (-1.21 D at 40°; P = .02), and Air Optix Night & Day Aqua (-0.23D at 20°, -0.48D at 30°, and -1.50D at 40°; all P < .004). All SCLs caused a negative change in SA. SCLs inducing less negative (more positive) SA changes were associated with a less hyperopic change in RPD.

Conclusions: Spherical SCL design can influence the peripheral defocus profile experienced by a myopic eye. Several, but not all, SCLs reduced peripheral hyperopia. Differences in how SCL types influence peripheral defocus may have implications for myopia progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative peripheral defocus (M) while wearing each of the four soft contact lenses and relative peripheral refraction with no lens on the eye. Positive values represent hyperopic defocus and negative values represent myopic defocus. Error bars represent the SEM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative peripheral J0 astigmatism with the four soft contact lenses and with no lens on the eye. Error bars represent the SEM.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative peripheral J45 astigmatism with the four soft contact lenses and with no lens on the eye. Error bars represent the SEM.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change in relative peripheral defocus averaged across the four soft contact lenses split by contact lens power. Positive defocus represents a hyperopic image shift and negative defocus represents a myopic image shift. The asterisks denote eccentricities at which the two groups are significantly different from one another. Error bars represent the SEM.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Slope estimates from linear mixed model showing the influence of eccentricity on the dioptric change in defocus per 1 micron (µm) change in on-axis spherical aberration (SA) due to the contact lens. Error bars represent the SEM.

References

    1. Lin LL, Shih YF, Tsai CB, et al. Epidemiologic study of ocular refraction among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:275–281. - PubMed
    1. Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012;379:1739–1748. - PubMed
    1. Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, et al. Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999–2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1111–1119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–1042. - PubMed
    1. Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen EC, et al. Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25:381–391. - PubMed