Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective multicenter international randomized controlled study
- PMID: 28228788
- PMCID: PMC5318178
- DOI: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.3.234
Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective multicenter international randomized controlled study
Abstract
Background: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) treated non-operatively can diminish function and quality of life, and lead to chronic health effects. The short-term safety and effectiveness of vertebroplasty for symptomatic VCFs are well-documented, but long-term follow-up is needed.
Purpose: The aim of this paper was to analyse a multicenter international experience of 200 compression fractures treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) and compare the results of this procedure with the result of 200 patients treated conservatively. To estimate cost-effectiveness of VP compared to conservative care in terms of: pain reduction, quality of life, complications, secondary fractures and mortality.
Materials and methods: 400 patients have been enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled study with painful VCFs with bone edema on MR imaging, local back pain for 6 weeks or less, osteoporosis and aged 55 years or older; after obtaining informed consent patients are included and randomized for VP or conservative care. Before treatment and at follow-up with regular intervals during 1-year period were administered to patients standard questionnaires addressing: clinical symptoms, pain medication, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score to evaluate functional activity.
Results: 200 patients treated with PV compared with 200 patients treated conservatively had significantly better VAS and used less analgesics 1 day after treatment. Twenty-four hours after VP, there was a reduction in pain scores and an improvement in physical functions, whereas remain unchanged in the patients treated conservatively.
Conclusions: Pain relief and improvement of mobility and function after PV is immediate and significantly better in the short term compared with non-surgical care treatment.
Keywords: conservative care; multicenter prospective randomized study; osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs); percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV).
References
-
- Voormolen MHJ, Mali WPTM, Lohle PNM, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with optimal pain medication treatment: short-term clinical outcome of patients with subacute or chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The VERTOS study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:555–60. - PMC - PubMed
-
- De Negri P, Tirri T, Paternoster G, et al. Treatment of painful osteoporotic or traumatic vertebral compression fractures by percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures a nonrandomized comparison between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Clin J Pain. 2007;23:5. - PubMed
-
- Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosa P, et al. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. J Neurochirurgie. 1987;233:166–8. - PubMed
-
- Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, et al. Initial out come and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26:1631–8. - PubMed
-
- Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26:1511–5. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources