Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 20;9(1):e987.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.987.

Comprehensive Review of Non-Operative Management of Hallux Rigidus

Charles Kon Kam King  1 , James Loh Sy  1 , Qishi Zheng  2 , Kinjal V Mehta  1
Affiliations
Review

Comprehensive Review of Non-Operative Management of Hallux Rigidus

Charles Kon Kam King et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

This article aims to provide an evidence-based literature review for the non-operative management of hallux rigidus. Currently, there is very little article on the evidence for the non-operative management of hallux rigidus. A comprehensive evidence-based literature review of the PubMed database conducted in November 2016, identified 11 relevant articles out of 560 articles assessing the efficacy of non-operative modalities for hallux rigidus. The 11 studies were then assigned to a level of evidence (I-IV). Individual studies were reviewed to provide a grade of recommendation (A-C, I) according to the Wright classification in support of or against the non-operative modality. Based on the results of this evidence-based review, there is poor evidence (grade C) to support use of intra-articular injections for pain relief for a period of three months and fair evidence (grade B) against the use of intra-articular injections for long term efficacy. There is poor evidence (grade C) to support manipulation and physical therapy and poor evidence (grade C) to support modifications in footwear, insoles and orthotics. There were no good evidence (grade A) recommending any interventions. In general, most of the interventions showed improvement. However, the evidence is poor in recommending orthosis, manipulation and intra-articular injections. There is a need for high-quality Level I randomized controlled trials with validated outcome measures to allow for stronger recommendations to be made. There is no study that looked solely at the use of pharmaceutical oral agents for the treatment of hallux rigidus. Non-operative management should still be offered, prior to surgical management.

Keywords: hallux rigidus; intra-articular injection; management; manipulative therapy; non-operative; orthosis; osteoarthritis; physiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of non-operative modalities
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plot of VAS for both rest pain and walking pain
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hallux rigidus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/107110070302401002. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(10):731–743. - PubMed
    1. Capsular interposition arthroplasty for severe hallux rigidus. Hamilton WG, O’Malley MJ, Thompson FM, Kovatis PE. Foot ankle Int. 1997;18(2):68–70. - PubMed
    1. Treatment of sesamoid disorders with a rocker sole shoe modification. Rosenfield JS, Trepman E. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11103762. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(11):914–915. - PubMed
    1. Nihal A, Trepman E, Nag D. Sports Med Arthrosc. 17(3) Sep: 2009. First ray disorders in athletes; pp. 160–166. - PubMed
    1. Hallux Rigidus and its treatment. Nilsonne H. Acta Orthop Scand. 1930;1:295–303.

LinkOut - more resources