Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec;32(6):414-420.
doi: 10.1159/000453010. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

Locoregional Therapies of Cholangiocarcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Locoregional Therapies of Cholangiocarcinoma

Christof M Sommer et al. Visc Med. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is the second most primary liver malignancy with increasing incidence in Western countries. Currently, surgical R0 resection is regarded as the only potentially curative treatment. The results of systemic chemotherapy and best supportive care (BSC) in patients with metastatic disease are often disappointing in regard to toxicity, oncologic efficacy, and overall survival. In current practice, the use of different locoregional therapies is increasingly more accepted.

Methods: A review of the literature on locoregional therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) was undertaken.

Results: There are no prospective randomized controlled trials. For localized ICC, either primary or recurrent, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is by far the most commonly used thermal ablation modality. Thereby, a systematic review and meta-analysis reports major complication in 3.8% as well as 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of 82, 47, and 24%, respectively. In selected patients (e.g. with a tumor diameter of ≤3 cm), oncologic efficacy and survival after RFA are comparable with surgical resection. For diffuse ICC, different transarterial therapies, either chemotherapy-based (hepatic artery infusion (HAI), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)) or radiotherapy-based (transarterial radioembolization (TARE)), show extremely promising results. With regard to controlled trials (transarterial therapy versus systemic chemotherapy, BSC or no treatment), tumor control is virtually always better for transarterial therapies and very often accompanied by a dramatic survival benefit and improvement of quality of life. Of note, the latter is the case not only for patients without extrahepatic metastatic disease but also for those with liver-dominant extrahepatic metastatic disease. There are other locoregional therapies such as microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation, and chemosaturation; however, the current data support their use only in controlled trials or as last-line therapy.

Conclusion: Dedicated locoregional therapies are commonly used for primary and recurrent ICC as well as liver-only and liver-dominant extrahepatic metastatic disease. Currently, the best evidence and most promising results are available for RFA, HAI, TACE, and TARE. In cohort studies, the overall survival rates are similar to those obtained with surgery or systemic therapies. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare safety and efficacy between different surgical, interventional, and systemic therapies, as well as their combinations.

Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma; Hepatic artery infusion, HAI; Microwave ablation, MWA; Radiofrequency ablation, RFA; Transarterial chemoembolization, TACE; Transarterial radioembolization, TARE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mahnken AH. Current status of transarterial radioembolization. World J Radiol. 2016;8:449–459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahnken AH, Pereira PL, de Baere T. Interventional oncologic approaches to liver metastases. Radiology. 2013;266:407–430. - PubMed
    1. Massmann A, Rodt T, Marquardt S, Seidel R, Thomas K, Wacker F, Richter GM, Kauczor HU, Bucker A, Pereira PL, Sommer CM. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for colorectal liver metastases - current status and critical review. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400:641–659. - PubMed
    1. Padia SA. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;18:227–235. - PubMed
    1. Singla N, Gahan J. New technologies in tumor ablation. Curr Opin Urol. 2016;26:248–253. - PubMed