Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;34(6):784-802.
doi: 10.1002/bsl.2277.

The Effects of Secret Instructions and Yes/no Questions on Maltreated and Non-maltreated Children's Reports of a Minor Transgression

Elizabeth C Ahern  1 , Stacia N Stolzenberg  2 , Kelly McWilliams  2 , Thomas D Lyon  3
Affiliations

The Effects of Secret Instructions and Yes/no Questions on Maltreated and Non-maltreated Children's Reports of a Minor Transgression

Elizabeth C Ahern et al. Behav Sci Law. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

This study examined the effects of secret instructions (distinguishing between good/bad secrets and encouraging disclosure of bad secrets) and yes/no questions (DID: "Did the toy break?" versus DYR: "Do you remember if the toy broke?") on 262 maltreated and non-maltreated children's (age range 4-9 years) reports of a minor transgression. Over two-thirds of children failed to disclose the transgression in response to free recall (invitations and cued invitations). The secret instruction increased disclosures early in free recall, but was not superior to no instruction when combined with cued invitations. Yes/no questions specifically asking about the transgression elicited disclosures from almost half of the children who had not previously disclosed, and false alarms were rare. DYR questions led to ambiguous responding among a substantial percentage of children, particularly younger children. The findings highlight the difficulties of eliciting transgression disclosures without direct questions. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahern EC, & Lamb ME (2013). Research-based child investigative interviewing. In Community Care Inform. Retrieved from http://www.ccinform.co.uk/guides/guide-to-child-investigative-interviewing/
    1. Anderson J, Martin J, Mullen P, Romans S, & Herbison P (1993). Prevalence of childhood sexual abuse experiences in a community sample of women. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 911–919. doi:10.1097/00004583-199309000-00004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown DA, Lamb ME, Lewis C, Pipe ME, Orbach Y, & Wolfman M (2013). The NICHD investigative interview protocol: An analogue study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, 367–382. doi:10.1037/a0035143 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bussey K, & Grimbeek EJ (1995). Disclosure processes: Issues for child sexual abuse victims In Rotenberg KJ (Ed.), Disclosure processes in children and adolescents (pp. 166–203). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Bussey K, Lee K, & Grimbeek EJ (1993). Lies and secrets: Implications for children’s reporting of sexual abuse In Goodman GS, & Bottoms BL (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony (pp. 147–168). New York: Guilford.