Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 23:7:43354.
doi: 10.1038/srep43354.

Assessment of Chicken Carcass Microbiome Responses During Processing in the Presence of Commercial Antimicrobials Using a Next Generation Sequencing Approach

Affiliations

Assessment of Chicken Carcass Microbiome Responses During Processing in the Presence of Commercial Antimicrobials Using a Next Generation Sequencing Approach

Sun Ae Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to 1) identify microbial compositional changes on chicken carcasses during processing, 2) determine the antimicrobial efficacy of peracetic acid (PAA) and Amplon (blend of sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate) at a poultry processing pilot plant scale, and 3) compare microbial communities between chicken carcass rinsates and recovered bacteria from media. Birds were collected from each processing step and rinsates were applied to estimate aerobic plate count (APC) and Campylobacter as well as Salmonella prevalence. Microbiome sequencing was utilized to identify microbial population changes over processing and antimicrobial treatments. Only the PAA treatment exhibited significant reduction of APC at the post chilling step while both Amplon and PAA yielded detectable Campylobacter reductions at all steps. Based on microbiome sequencing, Firmicutes were the predominant bacterial group at the phyla level with over 50% frequency in all steps while the relative abundance of Proteobacteria decreased as processing progressed. Overall microbiota between rinsate and APC plate microbial populations revealed generally similar patterns at the phyla level but they were different at the genus level. Both antimicrobials appeared to be effective on reducing problematic bacteria and microbiome can be utilized to identify optimal indicator microorganisms for enhancing product quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagram to illustrate the first processing stage for chicken carcass, antimicrobial treatments, and the sampling points taken for microbial analyses and microbiome.
Condition of antimicrobial treatment: Amplon spray (pH 1.3); simulated on-line reprocessing (OLR) with Amplon (pH 1.4 and a 15 s dip); post-chilling with Amplon (pH 1.4 and 15 s dip); post-chilling with PAA (750 ppm and 15 s dip). Ten birds were taken from each group (total 80 birds). PAA, peracetic acid.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average populations of aerobic plate counts (A) and Campylobacter (B) and Salmonella prevalence (C) on chicken carcasses (n = 10, each group) during general chicken processing steps. Values denoted by the same letter within each microbial group were not significantly different. All counts were considered significantly different at P < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bacterial reduction of aerobic plate counts on chicken carcasses (n = 10, each group) by antimicrobial treatments including Amplon spray, simulated OLR, post-chilling with Amplon, and post-chilling with PAA.
Values denoted by the same letter within each microbial group were not significantly different. All counts were considered significantly different at P < 0.05. PAA, peracetic acid.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Bacterial reduction of Campylobacter populations on chicken carcasses (n = 10, each group) by antimicrobial treatments including Amplon spray, simulated OLR, post-chilling with Amplon, and post-chilling with PAA.
Values denoted by the same letter within each microbial group were not significantly different. All counts were considered significantly different at P < 0.05. PAA, peracetic acid.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Reduction of number of Salmonella positive chicken carcasses (n = 10, each group) by antimicrobial treatments including Amplon spray, simulated OLR, post-chilling with Amplon, and post-chilling with PAA.
PAA, peracetic acid.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Alpha diversity analysis among groups. Rarefaction curves of (A) Observed_OTUs, (B) Chao 1, and (C) Shannon diversity. PAA, peracetic acid.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Beta diversity analysis among groups.
(A) Weighted and (B) unweighted UniFrac PCoA plots of individual chickens in each group. PAA, peracetic acid.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Relative abundance of major bacteria among different groups in chicken carcass rinsates at a phylum (A) and genus level (B). PAA, peracetic acid. f and o in parenthesis indicate family and order, respectively.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Relative abundance of major bacteria among different groups in APC Petrifilm at a phylum level (A) and genus level (B). PAA, peracetic acid. f in parenthesis indicate family.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Relative abundance of major bacteria in colonies from Campy-Cefex selective media at a phylum level (A) and genus level (B). f in parenthesis indicate family.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kearney J. Food consumption trends and drivers. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365, 2793–2807 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauermeister L., Bowers J., Townsend J. & McKee S. The microbial and quality properties of poultry carcasses treated with peracetic acid as an antimicrobial treatment. Poult. Sci. 87, 2390–2398 (2008). - PubMed
    1. Sahin O., Morishita T. Y. & Zhang Q. Campylobacter colonization in poultry: Sources of infection and modes of transmission. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 3, 95–105 (2002). - PubMed
    1. Kramer J. M., Frost J. A., Bolton F. J. & Wareing D. R. Campylobacter contamination of raw meat and poultry at retail sale: Identification of multiple types and comparison with isolates from human infection. J. Food Prot. 63, 1654–1659 (2000). - PubMed
    1. USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service. Food Safety and Inspection Service strategic plan: FY 2011–2016 http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/65602d92-d017-4edc-8536-5ed6aaa... (2011). Date of access: 01/12/2016.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources