Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Aug;83(8):1815-1825.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.13269. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

Evaluation of the immunogenicity of the dabigatran reversal agent idarucizumab during Phase I studies

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Evaluation of the immunogenicity of the dabigatran reversal agent idarucizumab during Phase I studies

Stephen Norris et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Aims: Idarucizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-dabigatran antibody fragment, is effective in emergency reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation. Pre-existing and treatment-emergent anti-idarucizumab antibodies (antidrug antibodies; ADA) may affect the safety and efficacy of idarucizumab. This analysis characterized the pre-existing and treatment-emergent ADA and assessed their impact on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of idarucizumab.

Methods: Data were pooled from three Phase I, randomized, double-blind idarucizumab studies in healthy Caucasian subjects; elderly, renally impaired subjects; and healthy Japanese subjects. In plasma sampled before and after idarucizumab dosing, ADA were detected and titrated using a validated electrochemiluminescence method. ADA epitope specificities were examined using idarucizumab and two structurally related molecules. Idarucizumab PK/PD data were compared for subjects with and without pre-existing ADA.

Results: Pre-existing ADA were found in 33 out of 283 individuals (11.7%), seven of whom had intermittent ADA. Titres of pre-existing and treatment-emergent ADA were low, estimated equivalent to <0.3% of circulating idarucizumab after a 5 g dose. Pre-existing ADA had no impact on dose-normalized idarucizumab maximum plasma levels and exposure and, although data were limited, no impact on the reversal of dabigatran-induced anticoagulation by idarucizumab. Treatment-emergent ADA were detected in 20 individuals (19 out of 224 treated [8.5%]; 1 out of 59 received placebo [1.7%]) and were transient in ten. The majority had specificity primarily toward the C-terminus of idarucizumab. There were no adverse events indicative of immunogenic reactions.

Conclusion: Pre-existing and treatment-emergent ADA were present at extremely low levels relative to the idarucizumab dosage under evaluation. The PK/PD of idarucizumab appeared to be unaffected by the presence of pre-existing ADA.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01688830 NCT01955720 NCT02028780.

Keywords: antibodies; anticoagulants; coagulation; immunology; pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pre‐existing anti‐idarucizumab responses in plasma from treatment‐naïve individuals from the three Phase I studies evaluated. (A) blocking of ADA assay responses by idarucizumab, (B) blocking of ADA assay responses with molecule 2 (a Fab with constant regions CH1 and CL identical to those in idarucizumab, but with different variable regions), and (C) lack of blocking of ADA assay response by molecule 1 (a full‐length IgG1 molecule containing two idarucizumab Fab fragments). ADA, antidrug antibody; RLU, relative luminescence units
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of (A) dose‐normalized maximum plasma concentrations (C max) of idarucizumab for all subjects with normal renal function who received a single 5‐min idarucizumab infusion and (B) dose‐normalized area under the plasma idarucizumab concentration–time curve (AUC0–∞) values for all subjects with normal renal function with and without pre‐existing anti‐idarucizumab antibodies; pooled data from the three Phase I studies. ADA, antidrug antibodies; AUC, area under the curve; C max, maximum plasma concentration; P5, P10, P90 and P95, 5th, 10th, 90th and 95th centiles
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of (A) mean diluted thrombin time assay and (B) ecarin clotting time assay results after anticoagulation with dabigatran followed by infusion of 5 g idarucizumab with and without pre‐existing anti‐idarucizumab antibodies in volunteers.aaThe figure includes all subjects who received a total dose of 5 g idarucizumab: n = 6, middle‐aged; n = 8, elderly; n = 6, mild renal impairment; n = 6, moderate renal impairment; n = 9, healthy Japanese volunteers. ADA, antidrug antibodies; ULN, upper limit of normal

References

    1. Southan C, Sharman JL, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Alexander SP, et al. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2016: towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands. Nucl Acids Res 2016; 44: D1054–D1068. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander SPH, Fabbro D, Kelly E, Marrion N, Peters JA, Benson HE, et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: Enzymes. Br J Pharmacol 2015; 172: 6024–6109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seeger JD, Bartels DB, Huybrechts K, Bykov K, Shash D, Zint K, et al. Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran relative to warfarin in routine care. Circulation 2015; 130: 16227. - PubMed
    1. Villines TC, Schnee J, Fraeman K, Siu K, Reynolds MW, Collins J, et al. The comparative safety and effectiveness of the oral anticoagulant (OAC) dabigatran versus warfarin utilized in a large healthcare system in non‐valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients [abstract]. Circulation 2014; 130: 18353.
    1. Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M, Zhang R, Southworth MR, Levenson M, et al. Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2015; 131: 157–164. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data