Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;10(3):479-488.
doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0054.

Creating a Culture of Empowerment in Research: Findings from a Capacity-Building Training Program

Carolyn Leung Rubin, Linda Sprague Martinez, Lisa Tse, Doug Brugge, Karen Hacker, Alex Pirie, Laurel K Leslie

Creating a Culture of Empowerment in Research: Findings from a Capacity-Building Training Program

Carolyn Leung Rubin et al. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016.

Abstract

Background: This paper uses a theory from educational research - "the culture of power" - to explore power differentials between academic researchers and community partners in community engaged research partnership programs.

Objectives: This paper describes how a capacity-building program illuminated the tensions between academics and community partners related to power differentials and offers strategies for how to balance the power dynamic.

Methods: This paper relies on semi-structured interviews from 30 community partners who participated in the "Building your capacity" program.

Results: The framework of "culture of power" applied to research relationships helps us understand the following: (1) The power differentials between academic institutions and community agencies are deeply entrenched. That is there is a "culture of power." (2) This culture of power is often reinforced through the cultural rules and dominant language of the academy. (3) Academic institutions, by and large, have created and perpetuated the rules that have led to these uneven power relationships. (4) Being told explicitly about the rules of academic culture make acquiring power easier for community partners. (5) Community partners are often more aware of the culture of power in research and more willing to acknowledge these differentials than academic researchers.

Conclusions: Academic partners who want to work with community partners need to acknowledge these power imbalances and be intentional about shifting these power dynamics. Capacity-building programs can help to shift these power imbalances because they help community partners acquire the confidence, knowledge and skills to advocate for more equitable research relationships.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Leshner AI, Terry SF, Schultz AM, Liverman CT, editors. Institute of Medicine (IOM) The CTSA program at NIH: Opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; pp. 116–27. - PubMed
    1. Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement. Principles of community engagement, 2nd edition [updated 2011 Jun] National Institutes of Health; Available from: www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement.
    1. Allen ML, Culhane-Pera KA, Pergament S, et al. A capacity building program to promote CBPR partnerships between academic researchers and community members. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4(6):428–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crosby LE, Parr W, Smith T, et al. The community leaders institute: an innovative program to train community leaders in research. Acad Med. 2013;88(3):335–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferre CD, Jones L, Norris KC, et al. The Healthy African American Families (HAAF) project: From community-based participatory research to community-partnered participatory research. Ethn Dis. 2010;20(Suppl 2):S2–1–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources