Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 15;6(1):8.
doi: 10.3390/foods6010008.

Reducing Postharvest Losses during Storage of Grain Crops to Strengthen Food Security in Developing Countries

Affiliations
Review

Reducing Postharvest Losses during Storage of Grain Crops to Strengthen Food Security in Developing Countries

Deepak Kumar et al. Foods. .

Abstract

While fulfilling the food demand of an increasing population remains a major global concern, more than one-third of food is lost or wasted in postharvest operations. Reducing the postharvest losses, especially in developing countries, could be a sustainable solution to increase food availability, reduce pressure on natural resources, eliminate hunger and improve farmers' livelihoods. Cereal grains are the basis of staple food in most of the developing nations, and account for the maximum postharvest losses on a calorific basis among all agricultural commodities. As much as 50%-60% cereal grains can be lost during the storage stage due only to the lack of technical inefficiency. Use of scientific storage methods can reduce these losses to as low as 1%-2%. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the grain postharvest losses in developing countries, the status and causes of storage losses and discusses the technological interventions to reduce these losses. The basics of hermetic storage, various technology options, and their effectiveness on several crops in different localities are discussed in detail.

Keywords: food security; grain storage; hermetic storage; postharvest losses; smallholders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Various factors and types of losses during the supply chain of cereal crops in developing countries.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Postharvest losses in the rice value chain in various countries (in the case of a range of losses, an average of losses was used).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustration of the factors affecting the grain and microorganism respiration in the hermetic storage (Adapted from Cardoso et al. [72]).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Amount of losses (a) weight loss; (b) seed germination losses, for various grains due to natural or artificial insect infestation during storage in traditional storage vs. hermetic storage (in the case of a range of losses, an average of the losses was used).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Losses in maize grain after 90 days of storage in various storage structures (data extracted from Figure 1 and Figure 2 of Costa 2014 [31]).

References

    1. Godfray H.C.J., Beddington J.R., Crute I.R., Haddad L., Lawrence D., Muir J.F., Pretty J., Robinson S., Thomas S.M., Toulmin C. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science. 2010;327:812–818. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hodges R.J., Buzby J.C., Bennett B. Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: Opportunities to improve resource use. J. Agric. Sci. 2011;149:37–45. doi: 10.1017/S0021859610000936. - DOI
    1. Parfitt J., Barthel M., Macnaughton S. Food waste within food supply chains: Quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2010;365:3065–3081. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0126. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourne M. Post Harvest Food Losses—the Neglected Dimension in Increasing the World Food Supply. Department of Food Science and Technology, Cornell University; Ithaca, NY, USA: 1977.
    1. Greeley M. Food, Technology and employment: The fram-level post-harvset system in developing countries. J. Agric. Econ. 1986;37:333–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1986.tb01602.x. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources