Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7):747-754.
doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

Well-Child Care Redesign: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Parent Experiences in the PARENT Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Well-Child Care Redesign: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Parent Experiences in the PARENT Trial

Naomi A Mimila et al. Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Parent-focused Redesign for Encounters, Newborns to Toddlers (PARENT), is a well-child care (WCC) model that has demonstrated effectiveness in improving the receipt of comprehensive WCC services and reducing emergency department utilization for children aged 0 to 3 in low-income communities. PARENT relies on a health educator ("parent coach") to provide WCC services; it utilizes a Web-based previsit prioritization/screening tool (Well-Visit Planner) and an automated text message reminder/education service. We sought to assess intervention feasibility and acceptability among PARENT trial intervention participants.

Methods: Intervention parents completed a survey after a 12-month study period; a 26% random sample of them were invited to participate in a qualitative interview. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method of qualitative analysis; survey responses were analyzed using bivariate methods.

Results: A total of 115 intervention participants completed the 12-month survey; 30 completed a qualitative interview. Nearly all intervention participants reported meeting with the coach, found her helpful, and would recommend continuing coach-led well visits (97-99%). Parents built trusting relationships with the coach and viewed her as a distinct and important part of their WCC team. They reported that PARENT well visits more efficiently used in-clinic time and were comprehensive and family centered. Most used the Well-Visit Planner (87%), and found it easy to use (94%); a minority completed it at home before the visit (18%). Sixty-two percent reported using the text message service; most reported it as a helpful source of new information and a reinforcement of information discussed during visits.

Conclusions: A parent coach-led intervention for WCC for young children is a model of WCC delivery that is both acceptable and feasible to parents in a low-income urban population.

Keywords: practice redesign; preventive care; randomized controlled trial; well-child care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PARENT Trial Outcome Measures

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hagan JF, Shaw JS, Duncan P, editors. Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 3. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2008.
    1. Schuster M, Duan N, Regalado M, Klein D. Anticipatory guidance: What information do parents receive? What information do they want? Arch Pediatr Adol Med. 2000;154:1191–1198. - PubMed
    1. Bethell C, Reuland CH, Halfon N, Schor EL. Measuring the quality of preventive and developmental services for young children: National estimates and patterns of clinicians' performance. Pediatrics. 2004;113(6 Suppl):1973–1983. - PubMed
    1. Chung PJ, Lee TC, Morrison JL, Schuster MA. Preventive care for children in the United States: Quality and barriers. Ann Rev Public Health. 2006;27:491–515. - PubMed
    1. Halfon N, Regalado M, Sareen H, et al. Assessing development in the pediatric office. Pediatrics. 2004;113(6 Suppl):1926–1933. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms