Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Sep;26(9):734-742.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006123. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

Effectiveness of a 'Do not interrupt' bundled intervention to reduce interruptions during medication administration: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of a 'Do not interrupt' bundled intervention to reduce interruptions during medication administration: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility study

Johanna I Westbrook et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of a 'Do not interrupt' bundled intervention to reduce non-medication-related interruptions to nurses during medication administration.

Methods: A parallel eight cluster randomised controlled study was conducted in a major teaching hospital in Adelaide, Australia. Four wards were randomised to the intervention which comprised wearing a vest when administering medications; strategies for diverting interruptions; clinician and patient education; and reminders. Control wards were blinded to the intervention. Structured direct observations of medication administration processes were conducted. The primary outcome was non-medication-related interruptions during individual medication dose administrations. The secondary outcomes were total interruption and multitasking rates. A survey of nurses' experiences was administered.

Results: Over 8 weeks and 364.7 hours, 227 nurses were observed administering 4781 medications. At baseline, nurses experienced 57 interruptions/100 administrations, 87.9% were unrelated to the medication task being observed. Intervention wards experienced a significant reduction in non-medication-related interruptions from 50/100 administrations (95% CI 45 to 55) to 34/100 (95% CI 30 to 38). Controlling for clustering, ward type and medication route showed a significant reduction of 15 non-medication-related interruptions/100 administrations compared with control wards. A total of 88 nurses (38.8%) completed the poststudy survey. Intervention ward nurses reported that vests were time consuming, cumbersome and hot. Only 48% indicated that they would support the intervention becoming hospital policy.

Discussion: Nurses experienced a high rate of interruptions. Few were related to the medication task, demonstrating considerable scope to reduce unnecessary interruptions. While the intervention was associated with a statistically significant decline in non-medication-related interruptions, the magnitude of this reduction and its likely impact on error rates should be considered, relative to the effectiveness of alternate interventions, associated costs, likely acceptability and long-term sustainability of such interventions.

Keywords: Cluster trials; Interruptions; Medication safety; Nurses; Randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rates of non-medication-related interruptions per 100 medication administrations by reason, source and location on the intervention wards before and after the ‘Do not interrupt’ intervention.

Comment in

References

    1. Westbrook JI, Woods A, Rob MI, et al. . Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:683–90. 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.65 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keers R, Williams S, Cooke J, et al. . Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systmatic review of direct observational evidence. Ann Pharmacother 2013;47:237–56. 10.1345/aph.1R147 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taxis K. Administration of medication. In: Dean Franklin B, Tully M. Safety in medication use. London: Taylor and Francis, 2016:35–44.
    1. Raban MZ, Westbrook JI. Are interventions to reduce interruptions and errors during medication administration effective?: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:414–21. 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002118 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bower R, Jackson C, Manning JC. Interruptions and medication administration in critical care. Nurs Crit Care 2015;20:183–95. 10.1111/nicc.12185 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms