Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep;47(9):1060-1071.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1480-3. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

Impact of intra-abdominal absorbable sutures on surgical site infection in gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: results of a multicenter, randomized, prospective, phase II clinical trial

Affiliations
Review

Impact of intra-abdominal absorbable sutures on surgical site infection in gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: results of a multicenter, randomized, prospective, phase II clinical trial

Yoshihiko Maehara et al. Surg Today. 2017 Sep.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: The use of absorbable sutures in wound closure has been shown to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI); however, there is no evidence that the intra-abdominal use of absorbable rather than silk sutures reduces the incidence of SSI after gastrointestinal surgery. We report the findings of a phase II trial, designed to evaluate the impact of the intra-abdominal use of absorbable sutures on the incidence of SSI.

Methods: At 19 Japanese hospitals, 1147 patients undergoing elective gastrectomy, colorectal surgery, hepatectomy, or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) were randomly assigned to absorbable or silk intra-abdominal suture groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of SSI. The secondary efficacy endpoints were the locations of SSI, time to resolution of SSI, length of hospital stay, and the incidence of bile leakage in hepatectomy and pancreatic fistula.

Results: The incidence of SSI was 11.3%, 15.5%, 11.3%, and 36.9% after gastrectomy, colorectal surgery, hepatectomy, and PD, respectively. The incidence of SSI was higher in the absorbable suture group than in the silk suture group for all the surgical procedures, but the difference was not significant.

Conclusion: The intra-abdominal use of absorbable sutures did not have enough of an effect on the reduction of SSI in this phase II trial to justify the planning of a large-scale phase III trial.

Keywords: Absorbable suture; Randomized prospective clinical trial; Silk suture; Surgery; Surgical site infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):606-12; discussion 612-3 - PubMed
    1. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Jul;74(1):627-35 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2004 May;239(5):599-605; discussion 605-7 - PubMed
    1. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(4):304-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Infect Control. 1991 Feb;19(1):19-35 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources