Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May;128(5):843-857.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 29.

Guiding transcranial brain stimulation by EEG/MEG to interact with ongoing brain activity and associated functions: A position paper

Affiliations
Review

Guiding transcranial brain stimulation by EEG/MEG to interact with ongoing brain activity and associated functions: A position paper

Gregor Thut et al. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 May.

Abstract

Non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation (NTBS) techniques have a wide range of applications but also suffer from a number of limitations mainly related to poor specificity of intervention and variable effect size. These limitations motivated recent efforts to focus on the temporal dimension of NTBS with respect to the ongoing brain activity. Temporal patterns of ongoing neuronal activity, in particular brain oscillations and their fluctuations, can be traced with electro- or magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG), to guide the timing as well as the stimulation settings of NTBS. These novel, online and offline EEG/MEG-guided NTBS-approaches are tailored to specifically interact with the underlying brain activity. Online EEG/MEG has been used to guide the timing of NTBS (i.e., when to stimulate): by taking into account instantaneous phase or power of oscillatory brain activity, NTBS can be aligned to fluctuations in excitability states. Moreover, offline EEG/MEG recordings prior to interventions can inform researchers and clinicians how to stimulate: by frequency-tuning NTBS to the oscillation of interest, intrinsic brain oscillations can be up- or down-regulated. In this paper, we provide an overview of existing approaches and ideas of EEG/MEG-guided interventions, and their promises and caveats. We point out potential future lines of research to address challenges.

Keywords: Brain oscillations; Electroencephalography; Magnetoencephalography; Non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation (NTBS); Temporally guided NTBS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

GT has received honoraria as editor from Wiley Publishers. FF is the lead inventor of IP filed by UNC. The clinical studies performed in the Frohlich Lab have received a designation as conflict of interest with administrative considerations. FF is the founder, CSO, and majority owner of Pulvinar Neuro LLC. HRS has served on a scientific advisory board for Lundbeck A/S, Valby Denmark, and has received honoraria as speaker from Biogen Idec, Denmark A/S, Genzyme, Denmark and MerckSerono, Denmark, has received honoraria as editor from Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Springer Publishing, Stuttgart, Germany, has received travel support from MagVenture, Denmark, and has received a research grant from Biogen-idec. UZ has received personal fees from Biogen Idec GmbH, Bayer Vital GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb GmbH, CorTec GmbH, Medtronic GmbH, and grants from Biogen Idec GmbH, Servier, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals NV, outside of the submitted work. CSH has received honoraria as editor from Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Principles of guiding non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation (NTBS) by electro- and/or magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG). A. The main rationale is to consider oscillatory network activity as targets for intervention. B. This relies on the combination of TACS&MEG or rTMS&EEG for guiding and documenting the intervention by MEG or EEG and for interacting with brain oscillations by TACS or rTMS. C. Three approaches are outlined, which either use ongoing EEG readouts to trigger interventions by instantaneous power or phase (C1), tune rhythmic intervention to the frequency of ongoing oscillations for entraining them (C2), or trigger interventions by phase of entrained oscillations (C3). See text for details and Figs 2–4 for examples of each of these three approaches.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Triggering NTBS by instantaneous phase/power of underlying brain oscillations. A. Design: Single-pulse TMS was triggered online to recordings by automatic detection of slow oscillation (SO) up-and down-states during NREM sleep EEG. TMS was applied over the primary motor cortical hand area. B. Result. B1. Both the size of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the hand muscle (left bar plot) and the TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) in the EEG (right line plot) depended on brain state at time of TMS. B2. Single-trial correlations (MEPs) and post-hoc single-trial binning (TEPs) according to EEG amplitude (here up-states) revealed that both MEP size (left panel) and TEP amplitude (right panel) scale with the EEG amplitude (i.e., actual voltage) at the time of TMS. Reproduced from Bergmann et al. (2012a) with permission.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Tuning NTBS to frequency of underlying brain oscillations. A. Entrainment of brain oscillations by rTMS (A1) and TACS (A2) when stimulation is directed to posterior alpha oscillations. B. Functional consequences in terms of perception of these interventions (B1 and B2). A1. Short bursts of alpha-rTMS over right parietal cortex promotes right parietal alpha-oscillations (relative to sham rTMS), and B1. biases visual perception away from the contralateral to the ipsilateral visual field (relative to rTMS at control “flanker” frequencies). A2. Alpha-TACS entrains occipital alpha oscillations (relative to pre and post EEG measures), and B2. causes visual perception to co-cycle with the entrained alpha rhythm. Reproduced from Thut et al. (2011), Romei et al. (2010) and Helfrich et al. (2014b) with permission.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Combined frequency-tuning and phase-triggering. A. Design: Prefrontal cortex was stimulated in nine TACS conditions, including gamma-TACS bursts nested in theta-TACS cycles (i.e. a crossfrequency phase-power TACS protocol), while EEG and working memory performance was recorded. B. Theta-gamma TACS enhanced working memory performance. This effect depended on the timing of the gamma-bursts relative to the theta cycle (phase modulation, upper bar plot), as well as on the frequency of the gamma bursts (frequency modulation, middle bar plot) and could not be explained by gamma-burst stimulation simply repeated at a theta-rate without the presence of a theta TACS waveform (DC offset controls, lower bar plot). C. Prefrontal theta-gamma TACS enhanced global brain connectivity, relative to all other conditions (here illustrated for sham). Reproduced from Alekseichuk et al. (2016) with permission.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Control of NTBS. A. Open-loop stimulation. Neural activity is extracted by signal processing techniques (e.g. beamforming in EEG/MEG), directly from neural implants, or inferred from a peripheral proxy such as muscle activity. The relationship between neural activity and stimulation waveform is then calculated (offline) to determine the influence of stimulation on, for example, the phase and amplitude of the endogenous neural activity. B. Closed-loop stimulation. Neural activity is readout in real-time and processed to determine the appropriate form of stimulation on a moment-by-moment basis. On-line processing is technique dependent, such as targeting specific phase points via TMS, or providing continuous feedback via phase locking in the case of TACS. In either case, closed-loop stimulation requires knowledge of target parameters (such as the optimal choice of phase) that may come from an a priori hypothesis, or be determined empirically by open-loop stimulation. Fully-closed loop approaches aim to enhance (or suppress) neural synchrony within- or between- target populations.

Comment in

References

    1. Alagapan S, Schmidt SL, Lefebvre J, Hadar E, Shin HW, Frӧhlich F. Modulation of Cortical Oscillations by Low-Frequency Direct Cortical Stimulation Is State-Dependent. PLoS Biol. 2016;14:e1002424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alekseichuk I, Turi Z, Amador de Lara G, Antal A, Paulus W. Spatial Working Memory in Humans Depends on Theta and High Gamma Synchronization in the Prefrontal Cortex. Curr Biol. 2016;26:1513–21. - PubMed
    1. Ali MM, Sellers KK, Fröhlich F. Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates large-scale cortical network activity by network resonance. J Neurosci. 2013;33:11262–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antal A, Boros K, Poreisz C, Chaieb L, Terney D, Paulus W. Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans. Brain Stimul. 2008;1:97–105. - PubMed
    1. Artola A, Bröcher S, Singer W. Different voltage-dependent thresholds for inducing long-term depression and long-term potentiation in slices of rat visual cortex. Nature. 1990;347:69–72. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources