Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;139(3):638e-648e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003059.

Gynecomastia Classification for Surgical Management: A Systematic Review and Novel Classification System

Affiliations

Gynecomastia Classification for Surgical Management: A Systematic Review and Novel Classification System

Daniel Waltho et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Gynecomastia is a common deformity of the male breast, where certain cases warrant surgical management. There are several surgical options, which vary depending on the breast characteristics. To guide surgical management, several classification systems for gynecomastia have been proposed.

Methods: A systematic review was performed to (1) identify all classification systems for the surgical management of gynecomastia, and (2) determine the adequacy of these classification systems to appropriately categorize the condition for surgical decision-making.

Results: The search yielded 1012 articles, and 11 articles were included in the review. Eleven classification systems in total were ascertained, and a total of 10 unique features were identified: (1) breast size, (2) skin redundancy, (3) breast ptosis, (4) tissue predominance, (5) upper abdominal laxity, (6) breast tuberosity, (7) nipple malposition, (8) chest shape, (9) absence of sternal notch, and (10) breast skin elasticity. On average, classification systems included two or three of these features. Breast size and ptosis were the most commonly included features.

Conclusions: Based on their review of the current classification systems, the authors believe the ideal classification system should be universal and cater to all causes of gynecomastia; be surgically useful and easy to use; and should include a comprehensive set of clinically appropriate patient-related features, such as breast size, breast ptosis, tissue predominance, and skin redundancy. None of the current classification systems appears to fulfill these criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CMA systematic approach to the surgical treatment of gynaecomastia.Br J Plast Surg200356237246
    1. Rahmani S, Turton P, Shaaban A, Dall BOverview of gynecomastia in the modern era and the Leeds Gynaecomastia Investigation algorithm.Breast J201117246255
    1. Schonfeld WAGynecomastia in adolescence: Effect on body image and personality adaptation.Psychosom Med196224379389
    1. Thorne CHM, Grabb WC, Beasley RWGrabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery2007New YorkWolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    1. Lanitis S, Starren E, Read J, et al.Surgical management of gynaecomastia: Outcomes from our experience.Breast200817596603

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources