Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Mar;139(3):670e-682e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003124.

A Comprehensive In Vitro Comparison of Preparation Techniques for Fat Grafting

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Comprehensive In Vitro Comparison of Preparation Techniques for Fat Grafting

Libor Streit et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Lipomodeling is a technique that uses the patient's own fat for tissue regeneration and augmentation. The extent of regenerative effect is reported to be determined by the numbers of adipose-derived stem cells and the viability of cells in processed adipose tissue which, together with other factors, influence the degree of graft retention. This study addresses whether differences exist in properties of fat graft obtained by three commonly used techniques.

Methods: Adipose tissue harvested from the hypogastric regions of 14 patients was processed by decantation, centrifugation, and membrane-based tissue filtration. The morphology of each preparation was assessed by electron microscopy and overall cell viability was assessed by live/dead assay. The number of adipose-derived stem cells was determined and their stem cell character was assessed by the presence of cell surface molecules (i.e., CD105, CD90, CD31, and CD45) and by their capacity to differentiate into adipogenic and osteogenic lineages.

Results: First, morphologies of processed fat samples obtained by individual procedures differed, but no preparation caused obvious damage to cellular or acellular components. Second, although the highest numbers of adipose-derived stem cells were contained in the upper fraction of centrifuged lipoaspirates, the difference between preparations was marginal. Third, the maximal concentration of adipose fraction (removal of watery component) of lipoaspirate was achieved by membrane-based tissue filtration. Finally, no significant differences in overall viability were detected.

Conclusions: Properties of processed lipoaspirate were influenced by the preparation procedure. However, the differences were not dramatic; both centrifugation and membrane-based filtration are methods of choice whose selection depends on other criteria (e.g., practicality) for individual surgical settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Illouz YGThe fat cell “graft”: A new technique to fill depressions.Plast Reconstr Surg198678122123
    1. Bircoll MCosmetic breast augmentation utilizing autologous fat and liposuction techniques.Plast Reconstr Surg198779267271
    1. Bircoll M, Novack BHAutologous fat transplantation employing liposuction techniques.Ann Plast Surg198718327329
    1. Bircoll MAutologous fat transplantation to the breast.Plast Reconstr Surg198882361362
    1. Coleman SRLong-term survival of fat transplants: Controlled demonstrations.Aesthetic Plast Surg199519421425

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources