Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Feb 23;7(2):e013965.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013965.

How do organisational characteristics influence teamwork and service delivery in lung cancer diagnostic assessment programmes? A mixed-methods study

Gladys N Honein-AbouHaidar  1 , Terri Stuart-McEwan  2 , Tom Waddell  3 , Alexandra Salvarrey  3 , Jennifer Smylie  4 , Mark J Dobrow  5 , Melissa C Brouwers  6 , Anna R Gagliardi  1
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

How do organisational characteristics influence teamwork and service delivery in lung cancer diagnostic assessment programmes? A mixed-methods study

Gladys N Honein-AbouHaidar et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Diagnostic assessment programmes (DAPs) can reduce wait times for cancer diagnosis, but optimal DAP design is unknown. This study explored how organisational characteristics influenced multidisciplinary teamwork and diagnostic service delivery in lung cancer DAPs.

Design: A mixed-methods approach integrated data from descriptive qualitative interviews and medical record abstraction at 4 lung cancer DAPs. Findings were analysed with the Integrated Team Effectiveness Model.

Setting: 4 DAPs at 2 teaching and 2 community hospitals in Canada.

Participants: 22 staff were interviewed about organisational characteristics, target service benchmarks, and teamwork processes, determinants and outcomes; 314 medical records were reviewed for actual service benchmarks.

Results: Formal, informal and asynchronous team processes enabled service delivery and yielded many perceived benefits at the patient, staff and service levels. However, several DAP characteristics challenged teamwork and service delivery: referral volume/workload, time since launch, days per week of operation, rural-remote population, number and type of full-time/part-time human resources, staff colocation, information systems. As a result, all sites failed to meet target benchmarks (from referral to consultation median 4.0 visits, median wait time 35.0 days). Recommendations included improved information systems, more staff in all specialties, staff colocation and expanded roles for patient navigators. Findings were captured in a conceptual framework of lung cancer DAP teamwork determinants and outcomes.

Conclusions: This study identified several DAP characteristics that could be improved to facilitate teamwork and enhance service delivery, thereby contributing to knowledge of organisational determinants of teamwork and associated outcomes. Findings can be used to update existing DAP guidelines, and by managers to plan or evaluate lung cancer DAPs. Ongoing research is needed to identify ideal roles for navigators, and staffing models tailored to case volumes.

Keywords: diagnostic techniques and procedures; interprofessional relations; lung neoplasms; patient care team; systems integration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lung cancer diagnostic trajectory.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptual framework of teamwork determinants and outcomes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brar SS, Hong NL, Wright FC. Multidisciplinary cancer care: does it improve outcomes? J Surg Oncol 2014;110:494–9. 10.1002/jso.23700 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gagliardi AR, Wright FC, Davis D et al. . Challenges in multidisciplinary cancer care among general surgeons in Canada. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:59 10.1186/1472-6947-8-59 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macleod U, Mitchell ED, Burgess C et al. . Risk factors for delayed presentation and referral of symptomatic cancer: evidence for common cancers. Br J Cancer 2009;101(Suppl 2):92–101. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605398 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pedersen AF, Olesen F, Hansen RP et al. . Coping strategies and patient delay in patients with cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 2013;31:204–18. 10.1080/07347332.2012.761319 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mansell G, Shapley M, Jordan JL et al. . Interventions to reduce primary care delay in cancer referral. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e821–35. 10.3399/bjgp11X613160 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types