Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Feb 24;7(2):e013415.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013415.

Advance care planning uptake among patients with severe lung disease: a randomised patient preference trial of a nurse-led, facilitated advance care planning intervention

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Advance care planning uptake among patients with severe lung disease: a randomised patient preference trial of a nurse-led, facilitated advance care planning intervention

Craig Sinclair et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Advance care planning (ACP) clarifies goals for future care if a patient becomes unable to communicate their own preferences. However, ACP uptake is low, with discussions often occurring late. This study assessed whether a systematic nurse-led ACP intervention increases ACP in patients with advanced respiratory disease.

Design: A multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial with preference arm.

Setting: Metropolitan teaching hospital and a rural healthcare network.

Participants: 149 participants with respiratory malignancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or interstitial lung disease.

Intervention: Nurse facilitators offered facilitated ACP discussions, prompted further discussions with doctors and loved ones, and assisted participants to appoint a substitute medical decision-maker (SDM) and complete an advance directive (AD).

Outcome measures: The primary measure was formal (AD or SDM) or informal (discussion with doctor) ACP uptake assessed by self-report (6 months) and medical notes audit. Secondary measures were the factors predicting baseline readiness to undertake ACP, and factors predicting postintervention ACP uptake in the intervention arm.

Results: At 6 months, formal ACP uptake was significantly higher (p<0.001) in the intervention arm (54/106, 51%), compared with usual care (6/43, 14%). ACP discussions with doctors were also significantly higher (p<0.005) in the intervention arm (76/106, 72%) compared with usual care (20/43, 47%). Those with a strong preference for the intervention were more likely to complete formal ACP documents than those randomly allocated. Increased symptom burden and preference for the intervention predicted later ACP uptake. Social support was positively associated with ACP discussion with loved ones, but negatively associated with discussion with doctors.

Conclusions: Nurse-led facilitated ACP is acceptable to patients with advanced respiratory disease and effective in increasing ACP discussions and completion of formal documents. Awareness of symptom burden, readiness to engage in ACP and relevant psychosocial factors may facilitate effective tailoring of ACP interventions and achieve greater uptake.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12614000255684.

Keywords: Advance care planning; advance directive; medical decision-making; randomised controlled trial; readiness; respiratory disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of participants approached, consented and recruited to trial. ACP, advance care planning; LCP, Liverpool Care Pathway.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Self-reported ‘readiness’ to complete an advance directive among participants assigned to different study groups over time. The sample is limited to participants (N=89) who responded to baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-up surveys.

References

    1. Sudore RL, Fried TR. Redefining the “planning” in advance care planning: preparing for end-of-life decision making. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:256–61. 10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sudore RL, Stewart AL, Knight SJ et al. . Development and validation of a questionnaire to detect behavior change in multiple advance care planning behaviors. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e72465 10.1371/journal.pone.0072465 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bischoff KE, Sudore R, Miao YH et al. . Advance care planning and the quality of end-of-life care in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61:209–14. 10.1111/jgs.12105 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Rietjens JA, van der Heide A. The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review. Palliat Med 2014;28:1000–25. 10.1177/0269216314526272 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Houben CHM, Spruit MA, Groenen MTJ et al. . Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014;15:477–89. 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.008 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources