Peanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): Novel single-dose oral food challenge study to validate eliciting doses in children with peanut allergy
- PMID: 28238744
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.030
Peanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): Novel single-dose oral food challenge study to validate eliciting doses in children with peanut allergy
Abstract
Background: Eliciting doses (EDs) of allergenic foods can be defined by the distribution of threshold doses for subjects within a specific population. The ED05 is the dose that elicits a reaction in 5% of allergic subjects. The predicted ED05 for peanut is 1.5 mg of peanut protein (6 mg of whole peanut).
Objective: We sought to validate the predicted peanut ED05 (1.5 mg) with a novel single-dose challenge.
Methods: Consecutive eligible children with peanut allergy in 3 centers were prospectively invited to participate, irrespective of previous reaction severity. Predetermined criteria for objective reactions were used to identify ED05 single-dose reactors.
Results: Five hundred eighteen children (mean age, 6.8 years) were eligible. No significant demographic or clinical differences were identified between 381 (74%) participants and 137 (26%) nonparticipants or between subjects recruited at each center. Three hundred seventy-eight children (206 male) completed the study. Almost half the group reported ignoring precautionary allergen labeling. Two hundred forty-five (65%) children experienced no reaction to the single dose of peanut. Sixty-seven (18%) children reported a subjective reaction without objective findings. Fifty-eight (15%) children experienced signs of a mild and transient nature that did not meet the predetermined criteria. Only 8 (2.1%; 95% CI, 0.6%-3.4%) subjects met the predetermined criteria for an objective and likely related event. No child experienced more than a mild reaction, 4 of the 8 received oral antihistamines only, and none received epinephrine. Food allergy-related quality of life improved from baseline to 1 month after challenge regardless of outcome (η2 = 0.2, P < .0001). Peanut skin prick test responses and peanut- and Ara h 2-specific IgE levels were not associated with objective reactivity to peanut ED05.
Conclusion: A single administration of 1.5 mg of peanut protein elicited objective reactions in fewer than the predicted 5% of patients with peanut allergy. The novel single-dose oral food challenge appears clinically safe and patient acceptable, regardless of the outcome. It identifies the most highly dose-sensitive population with food allergy not otherwise identifiable by using routinely available peanut skin prick test responses or specific IgE levels, but this single-dose approach has not yet been validated for risk assessment of individual patients.
Keywords: Eliciting dose; Peanut Allergen Threshold Study; Voluntary Incidental Trace Allergen Labelling; food allergy related quality of life questionnaire; oral food challenges; peanut thresholds; single dose.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Modified oral food challenge used with sensitization biomarkers provides more real-life clinical thresholds for peanut allergy.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Aug;134(2):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.035. Epub 2014 May 13. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014. PMID: 24831438 Clinical Trial.
-
The diagnostic value of component-resolved diagnostics in peanut allergy in children attending a Regional Paediatric Allergology Clinic.BMC Pediatr. 2016 Jun 2;16:74. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0609-7. BMC Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 27255511 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Objective eliciting doses of peanut-allergic adults and children can be combined for risk assessment purposes.Clin Exp Allergy. 2015 Jul;45(7):1237-44. doi: 10.1111/cea.12558. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015. PMID: 25900644 Clinical Trial.
-
Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jun;147(6):2249-2262.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.025. Epub 2021 Feb 9. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021. PMID: 33571537 Free PMC article.
-
Peanut allergy diagnosis: Moving from basic to more elegant testing.Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 May;31(4):346-357. doi: 10.1111/pai.13215. Epub 2020 Feb 11. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020. PMID: 31945225 Review.
Cited by
-
Expansion of the CD4+ effector T-cell repertoire characterizes peanut-allergic patients with heightened clinical sensitivity.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Jan;145(1):270-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.09.033. Epub 2019 Oct 22. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020. PMID: 31654649 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Japanese Food Allergy-Labeling System and Comparison with the International Experience; Detection and Thresholds.Food Saf (Tokyo). 2021 Dec 7;9(4):101-116. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.D-21-00008. eCollection 2021 Dec. Food Saf (Tokyo). 2021. PMID: 35004098 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of sleep deprivation and exercise on reaction threshold in adults with peanut allergy: A randomized controlled study.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Dec;144(6):1584-1594.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.038. Epub 2019 Jul 15. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019. PMID: 31319102 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Egg protein exposure estimation in risk assessment for Japanese food allergy labeling.Heliyon. 2024 Jun 24;10(13):e33545. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33545. eCollection 2024 Jul 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39035498 Free PMC article.
-
Peanut Immunotherapy: Stepping Towards Desensitization for Peanut Allergy.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 May;26(5):624-625. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.5.624. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020. PMID: 32347182 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous